Vulnerability Database

346,508

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2019-0055 — juniper / junos

Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency

A vulnerability in the SIP ALG packet processing service of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) to the device by sending specific types of valid SIP traffic to the device. In this case, the flowd process crashes and generates a core dump while processing SIP ALG traffic. Continued receipt of these valid SIP packets will result in a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS: 12.3X48 versions prior to 12.3X48-D61, 12.3X48-D65 on SRX Series; 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D130 on SRX Series; 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R3 on SRX Series; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2 on SRX Series.

  • Published: Oct 9, 2019
  • Updated: Nov 9, 2025
  • CVE: CVE-2019-0055
  • Severity: High
  • Exploit:

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: High
  • Score: 7.5
  • AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVSS v2:

  • Severity: Medium
  • Score: 5
  • AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

CWEs:

Software From Fixed in
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d10 12.3x48-d10.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d15 12.3x48-d15.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d35 12.3x48-d35.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d50 12.3x48-d50.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d30 12.3x48-d30.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d25 12.3x48-d25.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d45 12.3x48-d45.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d55 12.3x48-d55.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d40 12.3x48-d40.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d60 12.3x48-d60.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d50 15.1x49-d50.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d30 15.1x49-d30.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d70 15.1x49-d70.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d80 15.1x49-d80.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d110 15.1x49-d110.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d60 15.1x49-d60.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d100 15.1x49-d100.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d35 15.1x49-d35.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d45 15.1x49-d45.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d75 15.1x49-d75.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d65 15.1x49-d65.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d90 15.1x49-d90.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d40 15.1x49-d40.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d20 15.1x49-d20.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d10 15.1x49-d10.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d55 15.1x49-d55.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d120 15.1x49-d120.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49 15.1x49.x
juniper / junos 17.3-r2 17.3-r2.x
juniper / junos 17.3-r2-s2 17.3-r2-s2.x
juniper / junos 17.3-r2-s1 17.3-r2-s1.x
juniper / junos 17.3 17.3.x
juniper / junos 17.4-r1 17.4-r1.x
juniper / junos 17.4-r1-s1 17.4-r1-s1.x
juniper / junos 17.4-r1-s2 17.4-r1-s2.x
juniper / junos 17.4 17.4.x
juniper / junos 17.4-r1-s7 17.4-r1-s7.x
juniper / junos 17.4-r1-s4 17.4-r1-s4.x
juniper / junos 17.4-r1-s6 17.4-r1-s6.x

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.