Vulnerability Database

346,508

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2019-0056 — juniper / junos

Insufficient Resource Pool

This issue only affects devices with three (3) or more MPC10's installed in a single chassis with OSPF enabled and configured on the device. An Insufficient Resource Pool weakness allows an attacker to cause the device's Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) states to transition to Down, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) attack. This attack requires a relatively large number of specific Internet Mixed (IMIXed) types of genuine and valid IPv6 packets to be transferred by the attacker in a relatively short period of time, across three or more PFE's on the device at the same time. Continued receipt of the traffic sent by the attacker will continue to cause OSPF to remain in the Down starting state, or flap between other states and then again to Down, causing a persistent Denial of Service. This attack will affect all IPv4, and IPv6 traffic served by the OSPF routes once the OSPF states transition to Down. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX480, MX960, MX2008, MX2010, MX2020: 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R2-S4, 18.1R3-S5; 18.1X75 version 18.1X75-D10 and later versions; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R1-S5, 18.2R2-S3, 18.2R3; 18.2X75 versions prior to 18.2X75-D50; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R1-S4, 18.3R2, 18.3R3; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R1-S2, 18.4R2.

  • Published: Oct 9, 2019
  • Updated: Nov 9, 2025
  • CVE: CVE-2019-0056
  • Severity: High
  • Exploit:

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: High
  • Score: 7.5
  • AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVSS v2:

  • Severity: Medium
  • Score: 5
  • AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

CWEs:

Software From Fixed in
juniper / junos 18.1-r3 18.1-r3.x
juniper / junos 18.1-r2 18.1-r2.x
juniper / junos 18.1-r2-s2 18.1-r2-s2.x
juniper / junos 18.1-r3-s4 18.1-r3-s4.x
juniper / junos 18.1-r3-s3 18.1-r3-s3.x
juniper / junos 18.1-r3-s2 18.1-r3-s2.x
juniper / junos 18.1 18.1.x
juniper / junos 18.1-r2-s1 18.1-r2-s1.x
juniper / junos 18.1x75-d10 18.1x75-d10.x
juniper / junos 18.2 18.2.x
juniper / junos 18.2-r2-s1 18.2-r2-s1.x
juniper / junos 18.2-r2-s2 18.2-r2-s2.x
juniper / junos 18.2x75 18.2x75.x
juniper / junos 18.2x75-d20 18.2x75-d20.x
juniper / junos 18.2x75-d40 18.2x75-d40.x
juniper / junos 18.3-r1-s1 18.3-r1-s1.x
juniper / junos 18.3-r1 18.3-r1.x
juniper / junos 18.3-r1-s2 18.3-r1-s2.x
juniper / junos 18.3 18.3.x
juniper / junos 18.3-r1-s3 18.3-r1-s3.x
juniper / junos 18.4-r1 18.4-r1.x
juniper / junos 18.4 18.4.x

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.