Vulnerability Database

346,508

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2020-1640 — juniper / junos

Improper Input Validation

An improper use of a validation framework when processing incoming genuine BGP packets within Juniper Networks RPD (routing protocols process) daemon allows an attacker to crash RPD thereby causing a Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This framework requires these packets to be passed. By continuously sending any of these types of formatted genuine packets, an attacker can repeatedly crash the RPD process causing a sustained Denial of Service. Authentication to the BGP peer is not required. This issue can be initiated or propagated through eBGP and iBGP and can impact devices in either modes of use as long as the devices are configured to support the compromised framework and a BGP path is activated or active. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 16.1 versions 16.1R7-S6 and later versions prior to 16.1R7-S8; 17.3 versions 17.3R2-S5, 17.3R3-S6 and later versions prior to 17.3R3-S8; 17.4 versions 17.4R2-S7, 17.4R3 and later versions prior to 17.4R2-S11, 17.4R3-S2; 18.1 versions 18.1R3-S7 and later versions prior to 18.1R3-S10; 18.2 versions 18.2R2-S6, 18.2R3-S2 and later versions prior to 18.2R2-S7, 18.2R3-S5; 18.2X75 versions 18.2X75-D12, 18.2X75-D32, 18.2X75-D33, 18.2X75-D51, 18.2X75-D60, 18.2X75-D411, 18.2X75-D420 and later versions prior to 18.2X75-D32, 18.2X75-D33, 18.2X75-D420, 18.2X75-D52, 18.2X75-D60, 18.2X75-D65, 18.2X75-D70;(*1) 18.3 versions 18.3R1-S6, 18.3R2-S3, 18.3R3 and later versions prior to 18.3R2-S4, 18.3R3-S2; 18.4 versions 18.4R1-S5, 18.4R2-S4, 18.4R3 and later versions prior to 18.4R1-S7, 18.4R2-S5, 18.4R3-S3(*2); 19.1 versions 19.1R1-S3, 19.1R2 and later versions prior to 19.1R1-S5, 19.1R2-S2, 19.1R3-S2; 19.2 versions 19.2R1-S2, 19.2R2 and later versions prior to 19.2R1-S5, 19.2R2, 19.2R3; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S3, 19.3R3; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R1-S2, 19.4R2, 19.4R3; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R1-S1, 20.1R2. This issue does not affect Junos OS prior to 16.1R1. This issue affects IPv4 and IPv6 traffic.

  • Published: Jul 17, 2020
  • Updated: Nov 16, 2025
  • CVE: CVE-2020-1640
  • Severity: High
  • Exploit:

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: High
  • Score: 7.5
  • AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVSS v2:

  • Severity: Medium
  • Score: 5
  • AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Software From Fixed in
juniper / junos 17.4-r3 17.4-r3.x
juniper / junos 17.3-r3-s6 17.3-r3-s6.x
juniper / junos 17.4-r2-s7 17.4-r2-s7.x
juniper / junos 18.1-r3-s7 18.1-r3-s7.x
juniper / junos 19.1-r1-s3 19.1-r1-s3.x
juniper / junos 18.2-r2-s6 18.2-r2-s6.x
juniper / junos 18.4-r1-s5 18.4-r1-s5.x
juniper / junos 19.2-r1-s2 19.2-r1-s2.x
juniper / junos 17.4-r2-s8 17.4-r2-s8.x
juniper / junos 19.3 19.3.x
juniper / junos 19.3-r1 19.3-r1.x
juniper / junos 18.3-r1-s6 18.3-r1-s6.x
juniper / junos 18.2-r3-s2 18.2-r3-s2.x
juniper / junos 18.1-r3-s8 18.1-r3-s8.x
juniper / junos 19.2-r1-s3 19.2-r1-s3.x
juniper / junos 18.3-r3 18.3-r3.x
juniper / junos 16.1-r7-s6 16.1-r7-s6.x
juniper / junos 19.4-r1 19.4-r1.x
juniper / junos 19.3-r2 19.3-r2.x
juniper / junos 19.1-r2 19.1-r2.x
juniper / junos 18.4-r3 18.4-r3.x
juniper / junos 18.3-r3-s1 18.3-r3-s1.x
juniper / junos 18.1-r3-s9 18.1-r3-s9.x
juniper / junos 17.3-r3-s7 17.3-r3-s7.x
juniper / junos 19.3-r2-s1 19.3-r2-s1.x
juniper / junos 19.3-r1-s1 19.3-r1-s1.x
juniper / junos 19.2-r1-s4 19.2-r1-s4.x
juniper / junos 20.1-r1 20.1-r1.x
juniper / junos 19.4-r1-s1 19.4-r1-s1.x
juniper / junos 19.3-r2-s2 19.3-r2-s2.x
juniper / junos 19.1-r1-s4 19.1-r1-s4.x
juniper / junos 18.4-r1-s6 18.4-r1-s6.x
juniper / junos 18.3-r2-s3 18.3-r2-s3.x
juniper / junos 18.2-r3-s3 18.2-r3-s3.x
juniper / junos 17.4-r3-s1 17.4-r3-s1.x
juniper / junos 17.4-r2-s9 17.4-r2-s9.x
juniper / junos 17.4-r2-s10 17.4-r2-s10.x
juniper / junos 16.1-r7-s7 16.1-r7-s7.x
juniper / junos 18.2-r3-s4 18.2-r3-s4.x
juniper / junos 17.3-r2-s5 17.3-r2-s5.x
juniper / junos 18.2x75-d12 18.2x75-d12.x
juniper / junos 18.2x75-d51 18.2x75-d51.x
juniper / junos 18.2x75-d411 18.2x75-d411.x
juniper / junos 18.4-r3-s2 18.4-r3-s2.x
juniper / junos 18.4-r3-s1 18.4-r3-s1.x
juniper / junos 18.4-r2-s4 18.4-r2-s4.x
juniper / junos 19.1-r2-s1 19.1-r2-s1.x
juniper / junos 19.1-r3 19.1-r3.x
juniper / junos 19.1-r3-s1 19.1-r3-s1.x

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.