There is a carry propagation bug in the MIPS32 and MIPS64 squaring procedure. Many EC algorithms are affected, including some of the TLS 1.3 default curves. Impact was not analyzed in detail, because the pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely and include reusing private keys. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0.0. It was addressed in the releases of 1.1.1m and 3.0.1 on the 15th of December 2021. For the 1.0.2 release it is addressed in git commit 6fc1aaaf3 that is available to premium support customers only. It will be made available in 1.0.2zc when it is released. The issue only affects OpenSSL on MIPS platforms. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.1 (Affected 3.0.0). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1m (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1l). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zc-dev (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zb).
| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0 | 3.0.0.x |
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0-alpha1 | 3.0.0-alpha1.x |
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0-alpha10 | 3.0.0-alpha10.x |
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0-alpha11 | 3.0.0-alpha11.x |
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0-alpha12 | 3.0.0-alpha12.x |
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0-alpha13 | 3.0.0-alpha13.x |
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0-alpha14 | 3.0.0-alpha14.x |
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0-alpha15 | 3.0.0-alpha15.x |
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0-alpha16 | 3.0.0-alpha16.x |
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0-alpha17 | 3.0.0-alpha17.x |
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0-alpha2 | 3.0.0-alpha2.x |
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0-alpha3 | 3.0.0-alpha3.x |
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0-alpha4 | 3.0.0-alpha4.x |
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0-alpha5 | 3.0.0-alpha5.x |
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0-alpha6 | 3.0.0-alpha6.x |
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0-alpha7 | 3.0.0-alpha7.x |
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0-alpha8 | 3.0.0-alpha8.x |
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0-alpha9 | 3.0.0-alpha9.x |
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0-beta1 | 3.0.0-beta1.x |
| openssl / openssl | 3.0.0-beta2 | 3.0.0-beta2.x |
| openssl / openssl | 1.0.2 | 1.0.2zb.x |
| openssl / openssl | 1.1.1 | 1.1.1m |
| debian / debian_linux | 9.0 | 9.0.x |
| debian / debian_linux | 10.0 | 10.0.x |
| debian / debian_linux | 11.0 | 11.0.x |
| oracle / jd_edwards_world_security | a9.4 | a9.4.x |
| oracle / peoplesoft_enterprise_peopletools | 8.58 | 8.58.x |
| oracle / peoplesoft_enterprise_peopletools | 8.59 | 8.59.x |
| oracle / jd_edwards_enterpriseone_tools | 9.2.6.3 | 9.2.6.3.x |
| oracle / health_sciences_inform_publisher | 6.3.1.1 | 6.3.1.1.x |
| oracle / health_sciences_inform_publisher | 6.2.1.1 | 6.2.1.1.x |
| siemens / sinec_ins | 1.0-sp1 | 1.0-sp1.x |
| siemens / sinec_ins | - | 1.0 |
| siemens / sinec_ins | 1.0 | 1.0.x |
| oracle / enterprise_manager_ops_center | 12.4.0.0 | 12.4.0.0.x |
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.