Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2022-29247

Electron is a framework for writing cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript (JS), HTML, and CSS. A vulnerability in versions prior to 18.0.0-beta.6, 17.2.0, 16.2.6, and 15.5.5 allows a renderer with JS execution to obtain access to a new renderer process with nodeIntegrationInSubFrames enabled which in turn allows effective access to ipcRenderer. The nodeIntegrationInSubFrames option does not implicitly grant Node.js access. Rather, it depends on the existing sandbox setting. If an application is sandboxed, then nodeIntegrationInSubFrames just gives access to the sandboxed renderer APIs, which include ipcRenderer. If the application then additionally exposes IPC messages without IPC senderFrame validation that perform privileged actions or return confidential data this access to ipcRenderer can in turn compromise your application / user even with the sandbox enabled. Electron versions 18.0.0-beta.6, 17.2.0, 16.2.6, and 15.5.5 contain a fix for this issue. As a workaround, ensure that all IPC message handlers appropriately validate senderFrame.

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: Low
  • Score: 2.2
  • AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

CVSS v2:

  • Severity: Medium
  • Score: 6.8
  • AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

CWEs:

Software From Fixed in
electronjs / electron 18.0.0-beta1 18.0.0-beta1.x
electronjs / electron 18.0.0-beta2 18.0.0-beta2.x
electronjs / electron 18.0.0-beta3 18.0.0-beta3.x
electronjs / electron 18.0.0-beta4 18.0.0-beta4.x
electronjs / electron 18.0.0-beta5 18.0.0-beta5.x
electronjs / electron 17.0.0-beta1 17.0.0-beta1.x
electronjs / electron 17.0.0-beta2 17.0.0-beta2.x
electronjs / electron 17.0.0-beta3 17.0.0-beta3.x
electronjs / electron 17.0.0-beta4 17.0.0-beta4.x
electronjs / electron 17.0.0-beta5 17.0.0-beta5.x
electronjs / electron 17.0.0-beta6 17.0.0-beta6.x
electronjs / electron 17.0.0-beta7 17.0.0-beta7.x
electronjs / electron 17.0.0-beta8 17.0.0-beta8.x
electronjs / electron 17.0.0-beta9 17.0.0-beta9.x
electronjs / electron 17.0.1 17.2.0
electronjs / electron 16.0.0-beta1 16.0.0-beta1.x
electronjs / electron 16.0.0-beta2 16.0.0-beta2.x
electronjs / electron 16.0.0-beta3 16.0.0-beta3.x
electronjs / electron 16.0.0-beta4 16.0.0-beta4.x
electronjs / electron 16.0.0-beta5 16.0.0-beta5.x
electronjs / electron 16.0.0-beta6 16.0.0-beta6.x
electronjs / electron 16.0.0-beta7 16.0.0-beta7.x
electronjs / electron 16.0.0-beta8 16.0.0-beta8.x
electronjs / electron 16.0.0-beta9 16.0.0-beta9.x
electronjs / electron 16.0.1 16.2.6
electronjs / electron - 15.5.5
Node.js icon electron - 15.5.5
Node.js icon electron 16.0.0 16.2.6
Node.js icon electron 17.0.0 17.2.0
Node.js icon electron 18.0.0-beta.1 18.0.0-beta.6

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.