Vulnerability Database

374,078

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2022-50363 — linux / linux_kernel

Use After Free

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

skmsg: pass gfp argument to alloc_sk_msg()

syzbot found that alloc_sk_msg() could be called from a non sleepable context. sk_psock_verdict_recv() uses rcu_read_lock() protection.

We need the callers to pass a gfp_t argument to avoid issues.

syzbot report was:

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/sched/mm.h:274 in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 3613, name: syz-executor414 preempt_count: 0, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 0 INFO: lockdep is turned off. CPU: 0 PID: 3613 Comm: syz-executor414 Not tainted 6.0.0-syzkaller-09589-g55be6084c8e0 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/22/2022 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1e3/0x2cb lib/dump_stack.c:106 __might_resched+0x538/0x6a0 kernel/sched/core.c:9877 might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:274 [inline] slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:700 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3162 [inline] slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3256 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x59/0x310 mm/slub.c:3287 kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:600 [inline] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:733 [inline] alloc_sk_msg net/core/skmsg.c:507 [inline] sk_psock_skb_ingress_self+0x5c/0x330 net/core/skmsg.c:600 sk_psock_verdict_apply+0x395/0x440 net/core/skmsg.c:1014 sk_psock_verdict_recv+0x34d/0x560 net/core/skmsg.c:1201 tcp_read_skb+0x4a1/0x790 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1770 tcp_rcv_established+0x129d/0x1a10 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5971 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x479/0xac0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1681 sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1109 [inline] __release_sock+0x1d8/0x4c0 net/core/sock.c:2906 release_sock+0x5d/0x1c0 net/core/sock.c:3462 tcp_sendmsg+0x36/0x40 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1483 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline] sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:734 [inline] __sys_sendto+0x46d/0x5f0 net/socket.c:2117 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2129 [inline] __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2125 [inline] __x64_sys_sendto+0xda/0xf0 net/socket.c:2125 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x2b/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

  • Published: Sep 17, 2025
  • Updated: Dec 14, 2025
  • CVE: CVE-2022-50363
  • Severity: Medium
  • Exploit:
  • CISA KEV:

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: Critical
  • Score: 9.8
  • AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

CWEs:

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.