CVE-2023-38490
Kirby is a content management system. A vulnerability in versions prior to 3.5.8.3, 3.6.6.3, 3.7.5.2, 3.8.4.1, and 3.9.6 only affects Kirby sites that use the Xml data handler (e.g. Data::decode($string, 'xml')) or the Xml::parse() method in site or plugin code. The Kirby core does not use any of the affected methods.
XML External Entities (XXE) is a little used feature in the XML markup language that allows to include data from external files in an XML structure. If the name of the external file can be controlled by an attacker, this becomes a vulnerability that can be abused for various system impacts like the disclosure of internal or confidential data that is stored on the server (arbitrary file disclosure) or to perform network requests on behalf of the server (server-side request forgery, SSRF).
Kirby's Xml::parse() method used PHP's LIBXML_NOENT constant, which enabled the processing of XML external entities during the parsing operation. The Xml::parse() method is used in the Xml data handler (e.g. Data::decode($string, 'xml')). Both the vulnerable method and the data handler are not used in the Kirby core. However they may be used in site or plugin code, e.g. to parse RSS feeds or other XML files. If those files are of an external origin (e.g. uploaded by a user or retrieved from an external URL), attackers may be able to include an external entity in the XML file that will then be processed in the parsing process. Kirby sites that don't use XML parsing in site or plugin code are not affected.
The problem has been patched in Kirby 3.5.8.3, 3.6.6.3, 3.7.5.2, 3.8.4.1, and 3.9.6. In all of the mentioned releases, the maintainers have removed the LIBXML_NOENT constant as processing of external entities is out of scope of the parsing logic. This protects all uses of the method against the described vulnerability.
| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
getkirby / cms
|
- | 3.5.8.3 |
|
getkirby / cms
|
3.6.0 | 3.6.6.3 |
|
getkirby / cms
|
3.7.0 | 3.7.5.2 |
|
getkirby / cms
|
3.8.0 | 3.8.4.1 |
|
getkirby / cms
|
3.9.0 | 3.9.6 |
|
getkirby / kirby
|
3.9.0 | 3.9.6 |
|
getkirby / kirby
|
3.8.0 | 3.8.4.1 |
|
getkirby / kirby
|
3.7.0 | 3.7.5.2 |
|
getkirby / kirby
|
3.6.0 | 3.6.6.3 |
|
getkirby / kirby
|
3.5.0 | 3.5.8.3 |
- https://github.com/getkirby/kirby/commit/277b05662d2b67386f0a0f18323cf68b30e86387
- https://github.com/getkirby/kirby/releases/tag/3.5.8.3
- https://github.com/getkirby/kirby/releases/tag/3.6.6.3
- https://github.com/getkirby/kirby/releases/tag/3.7.5.2
- https://github.com/getkirby/kirby/releases/tag/3.8.4.1
- https://github.com/getkirby/kirby/releases/tag/3.9.6
- https://github.com/getkirby/kirby/security/advisories/GHSA-q386-w6fg-gmgp
Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity
SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.
- No setup fees
- 5-min deployment
- Cancel anytime
Frequently Asked Questions
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.