In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rxrpc: Fix potential data race in rxrpc_wait_to_be_connected()
Inside the loop in rxrpc_wait_to_be_connected() it checks call->error to see if it should exit the loop without first checking the call state. This is probably safe as if call->error is set, the call is dead anyway, but we should probably wait for the call state to have been set to completion first, lest it cause surprise on the way out.
Fix this by only accessing call->error if the call is complete. We don't actually need to access the error inside the loop as we'll do that after.
This caused the following report:
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in rxrpc_send_data / rxrpc_set_call_completion
write to 0xffff888159cf3c50 of 4 bytes by task 25673 on cpu 1:
rxrpc_set_call_completion+0x71/0x1c0 net/rxrpc/call_state.c:22
rxrpc_send_data_packet+0xba9/0x1650 net/rxrpc/output.c:479
rxrpc_transmit_one+0x1e/0x130 net/rxrpc/output.c:714
rxrpc_decant_prepared_tx net/rxrpc/call_event.c:326 [inline]
rxrpc_transmit_some_data+0x496/0x600 net/rxrpc/call_event.c:350
rxrpc_input_call_event+0x564/0x1220 net/rxrpc/call_event.c:464
rxrpc_io_thread+0x307/0x1d80 net/rxrpc/io_thread.c:461
kthread+0x1ac/0x1e0 kernel/kthread.c:376
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308
read to 0xffff888159cf3c50 of 4 bytes by task 25672 on cpu 0:
rxrpc_send_data+0x29e/0x1950 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:296
rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0xb7a/0xc20 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:726
rxrpc_sendmsg+0x413/0x520 net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c:565
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:724 [inline]
sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:747 [inline]
____sys_sendmsg+0x375/0x4c0 net/socket.c:2501
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2555 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x263/0x500 net/socket.c:2641
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2670 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2667 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0x57/0x60 net/socket.c:2667
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
value changed: 0x00000000 -> 0xffffffea
| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.2.1 | 6.2.16 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.3 | 6.3.3 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.2 | 6.2.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.2-rc4 | 6.2-rc4.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.2-rc5 | 6.2-rc5.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.2-rc6 | 6.2-rc6.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.2-rc7 | 6.2-rc7.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.2-rc8 | 6.2-rc8.x |
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.