CVE-2024-26614 — linux / linux_kernel
Improper LockingIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: make sure init the accept_queue's spinlocks once
When I run syz's reproduction C program locally, it causes the following issue: pvqspinlock: lock 0xffff9d181cd5c660 has corrupted value 0x0! WARNING: CPU: 19 PID: 21160 at __pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath (kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h:508) Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011 RIP: 0010:__pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath (kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h:508) Code: 73 56 3a ff 90 c3 cc cc cc cc 8b 05 bb 1f 48 01 85 c0 74 05 c3 cc cc cc cc 8b 17 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 30 20 ce 8f e8 ad 56 42 ff <0f> 0b c3 cc cc cc cc 0f 0b 0f 1f 40 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 RSP: 0018:ffffa8d200604cb8 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff9d1ef60e0908 RDX: 00000000ffffffd8 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff9d1ef60e0900 RBP: ffff9d181cd5c280 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000ffff7fff R10: ffffa8d200604b68 R11: ffffffff907dcdc8 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff9d181cd5c660 R14: ffff9d1813a3f330 R15: 0000000000001000 FS: 00007fa110184640(0000) GS:ffff9d1ef60c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000020000000 CR3: 000000011f65e000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <IRQ> _raw_spin_unlock (kernel/locking/spinlock.c:186) inet_csk_reqsk_queue_add (net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c:1321) inet_csk_complete_hashdance (net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c:1358) tcp_check_req (net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:868) tcp_v4_rcv (net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2260) ip_protocol_deliver_rcu (net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205) ip_local_deliver_finish (net/ipv4/ip_input.c:234) __netif_receive_skb_one_core (net/core/dev.c:5529) process_backlog (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:779) __napi_poll (net/core/dev.c:6533) net_rx_action (net/core/dev.c:6604) __do_softirq (./arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:27) do_softirq (kernel/softirq.c:454 kernel/softirq.c:441) </IRQ> <TASK> __local_bh_enable_ip (kernel/softirq.c:381) __dev_queue_xmit (net/core/dev.c:4374) ip_finish_output2 (./include/net/neighbour.h:540 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235) __ip_queue_xmit (net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535) __tcp_transmit_skb (net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1462) tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process (net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6469) tcp_rcv_state_process (net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6657) tcp_v4_do_rcv (net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1929) __release_sock (./include/net/sock.h:1121 net/core/sock.c:2968) release_sock (net/core/sock.c:3536) inet_wait_for_connect (net/ipv4/af_inet.c:609) __inet_stream_connect (net/ipv4/af_inet.c:702) inet_stream_connect (net/ipv4/af_inet.c:748) __sys_connect (./include/linux/file.h:45 net/socket.c:2064) __x64_sys_connect (net/socket.c:2073 net/socket.c:2070 net/socket.c:2070) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:129) RIP: 0033:0x7fa10ff05a3d Code: 5b 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d ab a3 0e 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fa110183de8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002a RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000020000054 RCX: 00007fa10ff05a3d RDX: 000000000000001c RSI: 0000000020000040 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007fa110183e20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fa110184640 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fa10fe8b060 R15: 00007fff73e23b20 </TASK>
The issue triggering process is analyzed as follows:
Thread A Thread B
tcp_v4_rcv //receive ack TCP packet inet_shutdown
tcp_check_req tcp_disconnect //disconnect sock
... tcp_set_state(sk, TCP_CLOSE)
inet_csk_complete_hashdance ...
inet_csk_reqsk_queue_add
---truncated---
| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.7 | 6.7.3 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.2 | 6.6.15 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.8-rc1 | 6.8-rc1.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 5.11 | 5.15.149 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 5.16 | 6.1.76 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 3.7 | 5.10.210 |
| debian / debian_linux | 10.0 | 10.0.x |
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/168e7e599860654876c2a1102a82610285c02f02
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/198bc90e0e734e5f98c3d2833e8390cac3df61b2
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3982fe726a63fb3de6005e534e2ac8ca7e0aca2a
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b1e0a68a0cd2a83259c444f638b417a8fffc6855
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bc99dcedd2f422d602516762b96c8ef1ae6b2882
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d86cc6ab33b085eaef27ea88b78fc8e2375c0ef3
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00017.html
Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity
SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.
- No setup fees
- 5-min deployment
- Cancel anytime
Frequently Asked Questions
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.