Vulnerability Database

407,332

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2024-6423 — wso2 / wso2_api_manager

Improper Input Validation

The product failed to enforce validation constraints on user-supplied input in URL parameters, allowing sensitive data to be passed to flows where it was not intended to be processed. Although the product did not utilize this data, its acceptance could lead to logging.

If a user mistakenly sends sensitive data via URL parameters to any flow, this data could be inadvertently logged in access logs. This has the potential to expose confidential information, compromising the security and privacy of affected systems if the product is used incorrectly.

  • Published: Oct 21, 2026
  • Updated: Oct 26, 2026
  • CVE: CVE-2024-6423
  • Severity: Medium
  • Exploit:
  • CISA KEV:

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: Medium
  • Score: 4
  • AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

CWEs:

Software Affected versions
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 3.1.0, < 3.1.0.313
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 3.2.0, < 3.2.0.406
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 3.2.1, < 3.2.1.30
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 4.0.0, < 4.0.0.324
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 4.1.0, < 4.1.0.185
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 4.2.0, < 4.2.0.124
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 4.3.0, < 4.3.0.36
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 4.4.0, < 4.4.0.2
wso2 / wso2_open_banking_am >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.0.363
wso2 / wso2_identity_server >= 5.10.0, < 5.10.0.337
wso2 / wso2_identity_server >= 5.11.0, < 5.11.0.384
wso2 / wso2_identity_server >= 6.0.0, < 6.0.0.213
wso2 / wso2_identity_server >= 6.1.0, < 6.1.0.211
wso2 / wso2_identity_server >= 7.0.0, < 7.0.0.50
wso2 / wso2_identity_server_as_key_manager >= 5.10.0, < 5.10.0.329
wso2 / wso2_open_banking_iam >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.0.381
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_application >= 6.3.0, < 6.3.0.18
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_application >= 6.3.11, < 6.3.11.23
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_application >= 6.3.58, < 6.3.58.1
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_application >= 6.5.0, < 6.5.0.5
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_application >= 6.6.0, < 6.6.0.1
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_application >= 6.7.8, < 6.7.8.4
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_application >= 6.7.32, < 6.7.32.1
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_core >= 5.17.5, < 5.17.5.286
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_core >= 5.17.118, < 5.17.118.11
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_core >= 5.18.187, < 5.18.187.263
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_core >= 5.18.248, < 5.18.248.23
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_core >= 5.23.8, < 5.23.8.189
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_core >= 5.24.8, < 5.24.8.12
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_core >= 5.25.92, < 5.25.92.91
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_core >= 5.25.92, < 5.25.92.118
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_core >= 5.25.705, < 5.25.705.11
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_core >= 5.25.713, < 5.25.713.2
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_core >= 7.0.78, < 7.0.78.27
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_oauth >= 6.4.2, < 6.4.2.142
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_oauth >= 6.4.176, < 6.4.176.20
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_oauth >= 6.4.180, < 6.4.180.8
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_oauth >= 6.8.0, < 6.8.0.40
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_oauth >= 6.9.6, < 6.9.6.16
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_oauth >= 6.11.21, < 6.11.21.44
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_oauth >= 6.13.16, < 6.13.16.6
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_oauth >= 6.13.19, < 6.13.19.2
wso2 / wso2_carbon_identity_oauth >= 7.0.26, < 7.0.26.18

Is CVE-2024-6423 exposed on your perimeter?

A vulnerability database tells you what is broken. Attack surface management tells you where it is running: it discovers your internet-facing assets and flags the ones affected by issues like this one.

What is attack surface management? →

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.