Vulnerability Database

393,544

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2025-13394 — wso2 / api_control_plane

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The Ajax processor within the Carbon console fails to adequately protect state-changing operations from Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. Specifically, it utilizes the HTTP GET method for these operations, and while the SameSite=Lax cookie attribute is employed for mitigation, this mechanism is bypassed as it permits cookies to be sent with cross-origin top-level navigation requests, including GET requests. This allows an attacker to trick an authenticated user's browser into unknowingly executing unintended actions.

An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to perform unauthorized state-altering requests on behalf of authenticated users. This could lead to consequences such as data modification, account changes, or other actions that could result in data compromise or loss of user control over their account. However, this attack is only feasible if the Carbon console and related services are exposed to the public internet, which is not recommended according to WSO2's security guidelines.

  • Published: Aug 6, 2026
  • Updated: Oct 4, 2026
  • CVE: CVE-2025-13394
  • Severity: Medium
  • Exploit:
  • CISA KEV:

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: Medium
  • Score: 5.4
  • AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

CWEs:

Software Affected versions
wso2 / api_control_plane >= 4.5.0, < 4.5.0.39
wso2 / api_control_plane >= 4.6.0, < 4.6.0.3
wso2 / api_manager >= 3.1.0, < 3.1.0.352
wso2 / api_manager >= 3.2.0, < 3.2.0.456
wso2 / api_manager >= 3.2.1, < 3.2.1.75
wso2 / api_manager >= 4.0.0, < 4.0.0.376
wso2 / api_manager >= 4.1.0, < 4.1.0.239
wso2 / api_manager >= 4.2.0, < 4.2.0.179
wso2 / api_manager >= 4.3.0, < 4.3.0.91
wso2 / api_manager >= 4.4.0, < 4.4.0.55
wso2 / api_manager >= 4.5.0, < 4.5.0.38
wso2 / api_manager >= 4.6.0, < 4.6.0.3
wso2 / enterprise_integrator >= 6.6.0, < 6.6.0.227
wso2 / identity_server >= 5.10.0, < 5.10.0.381
wso2 / identity_server >= 5.11.0, < 5.11.0.428
wso2 / identity_server >= 6.0.0, < 6.0.0.255
wso2 / identity_server >= 6.1.0, < 6.1.0.256
wso2 / identity_server >= 7.0.0, < 7.0.0.133
wso2 / identity_server >= 7.1.0, < 7.1.0.41
wso2 / identity_server >= 7.2.0, < 7.2.0.3
wso2 / identity_server_as_key_manager >= 5.10.0, < 5.10.0.372
wso2 / open_banking_am >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.0.401
wso2 / open_banking_iam >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.0.421
wso2 / traffic_manager >= 4.5.0, < 4.5.0.37
wso2 / traffic_manager >= 4.6.0, < 4.6.0.3
wso2 / universal_gateway >= 4.5.0, < 4.5.0.37
wso2 / universal_gateway >= 4.6.0, < 4.6.0.3

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.