Vulnerability Database

413,619

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2025-1397 — wso2 / wso2_universal_gateway

Missing Authorization

When utilizing JWT Bearer or SAML2 Bearer grant types, the system fails to validate the status of the Identity Provider (IDP) before issuing access tokens. This oversight permits tokens to be generated even when the associated IDP has been disabled.

A malicious actor could leverage this vulnerability to obtain access tokens by targeting a disabled IDP. This could enable them to bypass intended security controls and potentially access protected resources that should be inaccessible due to the IDP's disabled state.

  • Published: Nov 3, 2026
  • Updated: Nov 8, 2026
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1397
  • Severity: Medium
  • Exploit:
  • CISA KEV:

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: Medium
  • Score: 4.8
  • AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

CWEs:

Software Affected versions
wso2 / wso2_universal_gateway >= 4.5.0, < 4.5.0.10
wso2 / wso2_traffic_manager >= 4.5.0, < 4.5.0.10
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 3.1.0, < 3.1.0.321
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 3.2.0, < 3.2.0.414
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 3.2.1, < 3.2.1.50
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 4.0.0, < 4.0.0.335
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 4.1.0, < 4.1.0.211
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 4.2.0, < 4.2.0.150
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 4.3.0, < 4.3.0.63
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 4.4.0, < 4.4.0.26
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 4.5.0, < 4.5.0.10
wso2 / wso2_api_control_plane >= 4.5.0, < 4.5.0.11
wso2 / wso2_identity_server >= 5.10.0, < 5.10.0.346
wso2 / wso2_identity_server >= 5.11.0, < 5.11.0.396
wso2 / wso2_identity_server >= 6.0.0, < 6.0.0.232
wso2 / wso2_identity_server >= 6.1.0, < 6.1.0.224
wso2 / wso2_identity_server >= 7.0.0, < 7.0.0.93
wso2 / wso2_open_banking_am >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.0.370
wso2 / wso2_open_banking_iam >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.0.390
wso2 / wso2_identity_server_as_key_manager >= 5.10.0, < 5.10.0.339
wso2 / wso2_carbon_oauth >= 6.4.2, < 6.4.2.155
wso2 / wso2_carbon_oauth >= 6.4.111, < 6.4.111.134
wso2 / wso2_carbon_oauth >= 6.4.176, < 6.4.176.25
wso2 / wso2_carbon_oauth >= 6.4.180, < 6.4.180.11
wso2 / wso2_carbon_oauth >= 6.8.0, < 6.8.0.49
wso2 / wso2_carbon_oauth >= 6.9.6, < 6.9.6.22
wso2 / wso2_carbon_oauth >= 6.11.21, < 6.11.21.75
wso2 / wso2_carbon_oauth >= 6.13.16, < 6.13.16.15
wso2 / wso2_carbon_oauth >= 6.13.19, < 6.13.19.9
wso2 / wso2_carbon_oauth >= 6.13.27, < 6.13.27.2
wso2 / wso2_carbon_oauth >= 7.0.26, < 7.0.26.58
wso2 / jwt_grant_type_for_oauth2 >= 1.0.26, < 1.0.26.6
wso2 / jwt_grant_type_for_oauth2 >= 1.0.26, < 1.0.26.7
wso2 / jwt_grant_type_for_oauth2 >= 1.0.31, < 1.0.31.3
wso2 / jwt_grant_type_for_oauth2 >= 1.1.0, < 1.1.0.2
wso2 / jwt_grant_type_for_oauth2 >= 2.0.4, < 2.0.4.3
wso2 / jwt_grant_type_for_oauth2 >= 2.1.1, < 2.1.1.2
wso2 / jwt_grant_type_for_oauth2 >= 2.2.0, < 2.2.0.3
wso2 / jwt_grant_type_for_oauth2 >= 2.2.4, < 2.2.4.1
wso2 / jwt_grant_type_for_oauth2 >= 2.3.1, < 2.3.1.4

Is CVE-2025-1397 exposed on your perimeter?

A vulnerability database tells you what is broken. Attack surface management tells you where it is running: it discovers your internet-facing assets and flags the ones affected by issues like this one.

What is attack surface management? →

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.