Vulnerability Database

413,619

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2025-14260 — wso2 / wso2_api_manager

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Due to the improper implementation of access control rules, malicious actors could perform a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack on affected WSO2 Products. Exploiting this vulnerability allows a malicious actor to access both internal and external resources, available through the network or filesystem. This could potentially lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data and systems, regardless of whether these resources are located within a private network, as long as they are reachable by the WSO2 product.

  • Published: Oct 28, 2026
  • Updated: Nov 7, 2026
  • CVE: CVE-2025-14260
  • Severity: High
  • Exploit:
  • CISA KEV:

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: High
  • Score: 8.3
  • AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

CWEs:

Software Affected versions
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 3.1.0, < 3.1.0.354
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 3.2.0, < 3.2.0.458
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 3.2.1, < 3.2.1.99
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 4.0.0, < 4.0.0.379
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 4.1.0, < 4.1.0.265
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 4.2.0, < 4.2.0.205
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 4.3.0, < 4.3.0.115
wso2 / wso2_api_manager >= 4.4.0, < 4.4.0.79
wso2 / wso2_identity_server_as_key_manager >= 5.10.0, < 5.10.0.374
wso2 / wso2_open_banking_am >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.0.403
wso2 / wso2_open_banking_iam >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.0.423
wso2 / wso2_identity_server >= 5.10.0, < 5.10.0.383
wso2 / wso2_identity_server >= 5.11.0, < 5.11.0.430
wso2 / wso2_identity_server >= 6.0.0, < 6.0.0.256
wso2 / wso2_identity_server >= 6.1.0, < 6.1.0.257
wso2 / wso2_identity_server >= 7.0.0, < 7.0.0.134
wso2 / saml2_sso_authenticator_ui_bundle >= 5.5.0, < 5.5.0.2
wso2 / saml2_sso_authenticator_ui_bundle >= 5.5.2, < 5.5.2.5
wso2 / saml2_sso_authenticator_ui_bundle >= 5.5.9, < 5.5.9.4
wso2 / saml2_sso_authenticator_ui_bundle >= 5.5.10, < 5.5.10.1
wso2 / saml2_sso_authenticator_ui_bundle >= 5.6.4, < 5.6.4.1
wso2 / saml2_sso_authenticator_ui_bundle >= 5.7.2, < 5.7.2.1
wso2 / saml2_sso_authenticator_ui_bundle >= 5.8.3, < 5.8.3.1
wso2 / saml2_sso_authenticator_ui_bundle >= 5.8.7, < 5.8.7.2
wso2 / saml2_sso_authenticator_ui_bundle >= 5.9.4, < 5.9.4.2
wso2 / wso2_carbon_ui >= 4.6.0, < 4.6.0.2300
wso2 / wso2_carbon_ui >= 4.6.1, < 4.6.1.165
wso2 / wso2_carbon_ui >= 4.6.3, < 4.6.3.46
wso2 / wso2_carbon_ui >= 4.6.4, < 4.6.4.28
wso2 / wso2_carbon_ui >= 4.7.1, < 4.7.1.79
wso2 / wso2_carbon_ui >= 4.8.1, < 4.8.1.50
wso2 / wso2_carbon_ui >= 4.9.0, < 4.9.0.107
wso2 / wso2_carbon_ui >= 4.9.26, < 4.9.26.37
wso2 / wso2_carbon_ui >= 4.9.27, < 4.9.27.24
wso2 / wso2_carbon_ui >= 4.10.9, < 4.10.9.77

Is CVE-2025-14260 exposed on your perimeter?

A vulnerability database tells you what is broken. Attack surface management tells you where it is running: it discovers your internet-facing assets and flags the ones affected by issues like this one.

What is attack surface management? →

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.