Vulnerability Database

383,304

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2025-24978 — github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper/v2

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Summary

A Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in external service creation allows an authenticated attacker to inject HTML/script payloads into external service names, which may execute in a user's browser when rendered by administrative web interfaces.

Details

Prior to v2.4.0, external service registration endpoints did not strictly enforce alphanumeric character restrictions on service names. An operator or attacker with API access could register a service using a crafted name containing HTML elements (such as <iframe src="...">). If an administrative web UI rendered the unescaped service name, arbitrary script execution could occur in the context of the user's browser session.

PoC

  1. Create an external service JSON definition with a filename containing an XSS payload, e.g. <iframe src="javascript:alert1337">.json inside a ZIP archive.
  2. In external service creation, upload the ZIP and provide the matching service name: <iframe src="javascript:alert1337">.
  3. Upon service registration, the unescaped name executes when rendered in the UI context.

Impact

Self-XSS / Stored XSS leading to potential session token leakage or unauthorized actions in the context of the affected user's browser session.

Remediation & Patches

  • Upgrade to eKuiper >= 2.4.0: Strict alphanumeric identifier validation (validate.ValidateID) is now enforced on all external service creation and update endpoints, rejecting invalid characters.

Workarounds

  • Protect eKuiper management endpoints (POST /services) with authentication and network-level firewalls.

Credits

  • Reported by Alexey Kosmachev, Bi.Zone (@TheMostKnown)

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: Low
  • Score: 3.7
  • AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.