Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript. When using versions of Babel prior to 7.26.10 and 8.0.0-alpha.17 to compile regular expression named capturing groups, Babel will generate a polyfill for the .replace method that has quadratic complexity on some specific replacement pattern strings (i.e. the second argument passed to .replace). Generated code is vulnerable if all the following conditions are true: Using Babel to compile regular expression named capturing groups, using the .replace method on a regular expression that contains named capturing groups, and the code using untrusted strings as the second argument of .replace. This problem has been fixed in @babel/helpers and @babel/runtime 7.26.10 and 8.0.0-alpha.17. It's likely that individual users do not directly depend on @babel/helpers, and instead depend on @babel/core (which itself depends on @babel/helpers). Upgrading to @babel/core 7.26.10 is not required, but it guarantees use of a new enough @babel/helpers version. Note that just updating Babel dependencies is not enough; one will also need to re-compile the code. No known workarounds are available.
| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
@babel / helpers
|
- | 7.26.10 |
@babel / runtime
|
- | 7.26.10 |
@babel / runtime-corejs2
|
- | 7.26.10 |
@babel / runtime-corejs3
|
- | 7.26.10 |
@babel / helpers
|
8.0.0-alpha.0 | 8.0.0-alpha.17 |
@babel / runtime
|
8.0.0-alpha.0 | 8.0.0-alpha.17 |
@babel / runtime-corejs2
|
8.0.0-alpha.0 | 8.0.0-alpha.17 |
@babel / runtime-corejs3
|
8.0.0-alpha.0 | 8.0.0-alpha.17 |
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.