Vulnerability Database

352,427

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2025-38003 — linux / linux_kernel

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

can: bcm: add missing rcu read protection for procfs content

When the procfs content is generated for a bcm_op which is in the process to be removed the procfs output might show unreliable data (UAF).

As the removal of bcm_op's is already implemented with rcu handling this patch adds the missing rcu_read_lock() and makes sure the list entries are properly removed under rcu protection.

  • Published: Jun 8, 2025
  • Updated: Dec 18, 2025
  • CVE: CVE-2025-38003
  • Severity: Medium
  • Exploit:
  • CISA KEV:

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: Medium
  • Score: 5.5
  • AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

No CWE or OWASP classifications available.

Software From Fixed in
linux / linux_kernel 4.19.252 4.20
linux / linux_kernel 5.4.205 5.4.294
linux / linux_kernel 5.10.130 5.10.238
linux / linux_kernel 5.15.54 5.15.185
linux / linux_kernel 5.18.11 5.19
linux / linux_kernel 5.19.1 6.1.141
linux / linux_kernel 6.2 6.6.93
linux / linux_kernel 6.7 6.12.31
linux / linux_kernel 6.13 6.14.9
linux / linux_kernel 5.19 5.19.x
linux / linux_kernel 5.19-rc6 5.19-rc6.x
linux / linux_kernel 5.19-rc7 5.19-rc7.x
linux / linux_kernel 5.19-rc8 5.19-rc8.x
linux / linux_kernel 6.15-rc1 6.15-rc1.x
linux / linux_kernel 6.15-rc2 6.15-rc2.x
linux / linux_kernel 6.15-rc3 6.15-rc3.x
linux / linux_kernel 6.15-rc4 6.15-rc4.x
linux / linux_kernel 6.15-rc5 6.15-rc5.x
linux / linux_kernel 6.15-rc6 6.15-rc6.x
linux / linux_kernel 6.15-rc7 6.15-rc7.x
debian / debian_linux 11.0 11.0.x

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.