How should we interpret CVSS severity scores?

CVSS estimates technical severity, but it does not automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, asset criticality, known exploitation, and whether compensating controls exist. A Medium CVSS on an exposed production system can be more urgent than a Critical on an isolated non-production host.

Vulnerability Database

Q: What is a Vulnerability (CVE) and why does it matter?

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

Q: What's the difference between a vulnerability, an exploit, and a zero-day?

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. Risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Q: Why do vulnerabilities keep reappearing in our environment?

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete asset discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host.

Q: How do we prioritize remediation without burning out the team?

Use a repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress so remediation is steady, not reactive.

Q: How can SynScan help reduce vulnerability risk over time?

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.

373,546

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2025-38475 — linux / linux_kernel

NULL Pointer Dereference

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

smc: Fix various oops due to inet_sock type confusion.

syzbot reported weird splats [0][1] in cipso_v4_sock_setattr() while freeing inet_sk(sk)->inet_opt.

The address was freed multiple times even though it was read-only memory.

cipso_v4_sock_setattr() did nothing wrong, and the root cause was type confusion.

The cited commit made it possible to create smc_sock as an INET socket.

The issue is that struct smc_sock does not have struct inet_sock as the first member but hijacks AF_INET and AF_INET6 sk_family, which confuses various places.

In this case, inet_sock.inet_opt was actually smc_sock.clcsk_data_ready(), which is an address of a function in the text segment.

$ pahole -C inet_sock vmlinux struct inet_sock { ... struct ip_options_rcu * inet_opt; /* 784 8 */

$ pahole -C smc_sock vmlinux struct smc_sock { ... void (*clcsk_data_ready)(struct sock ); / 784 8 */

The same issue for another field was reported before. [2][3]

At that time, an ugly hack was suggested [4], but it makes both INET and SMC code error-prone and hard to change.

Also, yet another variant was fixed by a hacky commit 98d4435efcbf3 ("net/smc: prevent NULL pointer dereference in txopt_get").

Instead of papering over the root cause by such hacks, we should not allow non-INET socket to reuse the INET infra.

Let's add inet_sock as the first member of smc_sock.

[0]: kvfree_call_rcu(): Double-freed call. rcu_head 000000006921da73 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6718 at mm/slab_common.c:1956 kvfree_call_rcu+0x94/0x3f0 mm/slab_common.c:1955 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6718 Comm: syz.0.17 Tainted: G W 6.16.0-rc4-syzkaller-g7482bb149b9f #0 PREEMPT Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 05/07/2025 pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : kvfree_call_rcu+0x94/0x3f0 mm/slab_common.c:1955 lr : kvfree_call_rcu+0x94/0x3f0 mm/slab_common.c:1955 sp : ffff8000a03a7730 x29: ffff8000a03a7730 x28: 00000000fffffff5 x27: 1fffe000184823d3 x26: dfff800000000000 x25: ffff0000c2411e9e x24: ffff0000dd88da00 x23: ffff8000891ac9a0 x22: 00000000ffffffea x21: ffff8000891ac9a0 x20: ffff8000891ac9a0 x19: ffff80008afc2480 x18: 00000000ffffffff x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffff80008ae642c8 x15: ffff700011ede14c x14: 1ffff00011ede14c x13: 0000000000000004 x12: ffffffffffffffff x11: ffff700011ede14c x10: 0000000000ff0100 x9 : 5fa3c1ffaf0ff000 x8 : 5fa3c1ffaf0ff000 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : 0000000000000001 x5 : ffff8000a03a7078 x4 : ffff80008f766c20 x3 : ffff80008054d360 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000201 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: kvfree_call_rcu+0x94/0x3f0 mm/slab_common.c:1955 (P) cipso_v4_sock_setattr+0x2f0/0x3f4 net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c:1914 netlbl_sock_setattr+0x240/0x334 net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c:1000 smack_netlbl_add+0xa8/0x158 security/smack/smack_lsm.c:2581 smack_inode_setsecurity+0x378/0x430 security/smack/smack_lsm.c:2912 security_inode_setsecurity+0x118/0x3c0 security/security.c:2706 __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x174/0x5c4 fs/xattr.c:251 __vfs_setxattr_locked+0x1ec/0x218 fs/xattr.c:295 vfs_setxattr+0x158/0x2ac fs/xattr.c:321 do_setxattr fs/xattr.c:636 [inline] file_setxattr+0x1b8/0x294 fs/xattr.c:646 path_setxattrat+0x2ac/0x320 fs/xattr.c:711 __do_sys_fsetxattr fs/xattr.c:761 [inline] __se_sys_fsetxattr fs/xattr.c:758 [inline] __arm64_sys_fsetxattr+0xc0/0xdc fs/xattr.c:758 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:35 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:49 el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:132 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:151 el0_svc+0x58/0x180 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:879 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0x12c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:898 el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:600

[ ---truncated---

Published: Jul 28, 2025
Updated: Nov 20, 2025
CVE: CVE-2025-38475
Severity: Medium
Exploit:
CISA KEV:

CVSS v3:

Severity: High
Score: 7.8
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

CWEs:

CWE-476

Affected Software
References

Software	From	Fixed in
linux / linux_kernel	6.11	6.12.40
linux / linux_kernel	6.13	6.15.8
linux / linux_kernel	6.16-rc1	6.16-rc1.x
linux / linux_kernel	6.16-rc2	6.16-rc2.x
linux / linux_kernel	6.16-rc3	6.16-rc3.x
linux / linux_kernel	6.16-rc4	6.16-rc4.x
linux / linux_kernel	6.16-rc5	6.16-rc5.x
linux / linux_kernel	6.16-rc6	6.16-rc6.x

Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity

SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.

No setup fees
5-min deployment
Cancel anytime

Book a Demo

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Vulnerability (CVE) and why does it matter?

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.