In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ocfs2: fix recursive semaphore deadlock in fiemap call
syzbot detected a OCFS2 hang due to a recursive semaphore on a FS_IOC_FIEMAP of the extent list on a specially crafted mmap file.
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5357 [inline] __schedule+0x1798/0x4cc0 kernel/sched/core.c:6961 __schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:7043 [inline] schedule+0x165/0x360 kernel/sched/core.c:7058 schedule_preempt_disabled+0x13/0x30 kernel/sched/core.c:7115 rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x872/0xfe0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1185 __down_write_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1317 [inline] __down_write kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1326 [inline] down_write+0x1ab/0x1f0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1591 ocfs2_page_mkwrite+0x2ff/0xc40 fs/ocfs2/mmap.c:142 do_page_mkwrite+0x14d/0x310 mm/memory.c:3361 wp_page_shared mm/memory.c:3762 [inline] do_wp_page+0x268d/0x5800 mm/memory.c:3981 handle_pte_fault mm/memory.c:6068 [inline] __handle_mm_fault+0x1033/0x5440 mm/memory.c:6195 handle_mm_fault+0x40a/0x8e0 mm/memory.c:6364 do_user_addr_fault+0x764/0x1390 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1387 handle_page_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1476 [inline] exc_page_fault+0x76/0xf0 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1532 asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:623 RIP: 0010:copy_user_generic arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:126 [inline] RIP: 0010:raw_copy_to_user arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:147 [inline] RIP: 0010:_inline_copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:197 [inline] RIP: 0010:_copy_to_user+0x85/0xb0 lib/usercopy.c:26 Code: e8 00 bc f7 fc 4d 39 fc 72 3d 4d 39 ec 77 38 e8 91 b9 f7 fc 4c 89 f7 89 de e8 47 25 5b fd 0f 01 cb 4c 89 ff 48 89 d9 4c 89 f6 <f3> a4 0f 1f 00 48 89 cb 0f 01 ca 48 89 d8 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000403f950 EFLAGS: 00050256 RAX: ffffffff84c7f101 RBX: 0000000000000038 RCX: 0000000000000038 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffc9000403f9e0 RDI: 0000200000000060 RBP: ffffc9000403fa90 R08: ffffc9000403fa17 R09: 1ffff92000807f42 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff52000807f43 R12: 0000200000000098 R13: 00007ffffffff000 R14: ffffc9000403f9e0 R15: 0000200000000060 copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:225 [inline] fiemap_fill_next_extent+0x1c0/0x390 fs/ioctl.c:145 ocfs2_fiemap+0x888/0xc90 fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c:806 ioctl_fiemap fs/ioctl.c:220 [inline] do_vfs_ioctl+0x1173/0x1430 fs/ioctl.c:532 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:596 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0x82/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:584 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f5f13850fd9 RSP: 002b:00007ffe3b3518b8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000200000000000 RCX: 00007f5f13850fd9 RDX: 0000200000000040 RSI: 00000000c020660b RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 6165627472616568 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffe3b3518f0 R13: 00007ffe3b351b18 R14: 431bde82d7b634db R15: 00007f5f1389a03b
ocfs2_fiemap() takes a read lock of the ip_alloc_sem semaphore (since v2.6.22-527-g7307de80510a) and calls fiemap_fill_next_extent() to read the extent list of this running mmap executable. The user supplied buffer to hold the fiemap information page faults calling ocfs2_page_mkwrite() which will take a write lock (since v2.6.27-38-g00dc417fa3e7) of the same semaphore. This recursive semaphore will hold filesystem locks and causes a hang of the fileystem.
The ip_alloc_sem protects the inode extent list and size. Release the read semphore before calling fiemap_fill_next_extent() in ocfs2_fiemap() and ocfs2_fiemap_inline(). This does an unnecessary semaphore lock/unlock on the last extent but simplifies the error path.
| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| linux / linux_kernel | 2.6.28 | 5.4.300 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 5.5 | 5.10.245 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 5.11 | 5.15.194 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 5.16 | 6.1.153 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.2 | 6.6.107 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.7 | 6.12.48 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.13 | 6.16.8 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.17-rc1 | 6.17-rc1.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.17-rc2 | 6.17-rc2.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.17-rc3 | 6.17-rc3.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.17-rc4 | 6.17-rc4.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.17-rc5 | 6.17-rc5.x |
| debian / debian_linux | 11.0 | 11.0.x |
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.