Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2025-41234

Description

In Spring Framework, versions 6.0.x as of 6.0.5, versions 6.1.x and 6.2.x, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a “Content-Disposition” header with a non-ASCII charset, where the filename attribute is derived from user-supplied input.

Specifically, an application is vulnerable when all the following are true:

  • The header is prepared with org.springframework.http.ContentDisposition.
  • The filename is set via ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, Charset).
  • The value for the filename is derived from user-supplied input.
  • The application does not sanitize the user-supplied input.
  • The downloaded content of the response is injected with malicious commands by the attacker (see RFD paper reference for details).

An application is not vulnerable if any of the following is true:

  • The application does not set a “Content-Disposition” response header.

  • The header is not prepared with org.springframework.http.ContentDisposition.

  • The filename is set via one of: * ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String), or

  • ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, ASCII)

  • The filename is not derived from user-supplied input.

  • The filename is derived from user-supplied input but sanitized by the application.

  • The attacker cannot inject malicious content in the downloaded content of the response.

Affected Spring Products and VersionsSpring Framework:

  • 6.2.0 - 6.2.7
  • 6.1.0 - 6.1.20
  • 6.0.5 - 6.0.28
  • Older, unsupported versions are not affected

MitigationUsers of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version.

Affected version(s)Fix versionAvailability6.2.x6.2.8OSS6.1.x6.1.21OSS6.0.x6.0.29 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ No further mitigation steps are necessary.

CWE-113 in Content-Disposition handling in VMware Spring Framework versions 6.0.5 to 6.2.7 allows remote attackers to launch Reflected File Download (RFD) attacks via unsanitized user input in ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, Charset) with non-ASCII charsets.

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: Unknown
  • Score:
  • AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

CWEs:

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.