Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2025-52980

A Use of Incorrect Byte Ordering

vulnerability

in the Routing Protocol Daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX300 Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS).

When a BGP update is received over an established BGP session which contains a specific, valid, optional, transitive path attribute, rpd will crash and restart.

This issue affects eBGP and iBGP over IPv4 and IPv6.

This issue affects:

Junos OS:

  • 22.1 versions from 22.1R1 before 22.2R3-S4,
  • 22.3 versions before 22.3R3-S3,
  • 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S2,
  • 23.2 versions before 23.2R2,
  • 23.4 versions before 23.4R2.
  • Published: Jul 11, 2025
  • Updated: Nov 16, 2025
  • CVE: CVE-2025-52980
  • Severity: High
  • Exploit:

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: High
  • Score: 7.5
  • AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CWEs:

Software From Fixed in
juniper / junos 22.1-r1 22.1-r1.x
juniper / junos 22.1-r1-s1 22.1-r1-s1.x
juniper / junos 22.1-r1-s2 22.1-r1-s2.x
juniper / junos 22.1-r2 22.1-r2.x
juniper / junos 22.1-r2-s1 22.1-r2-s1.x
juniper / junos 22.1-r2-s2 22.1-r2-s2.x
juniper / junos 22.1-r3 22.1-r3.x
juniper / junos 22.1-r3-s1 22.1-r3-s1.x
juniper / junos 22.1-r3-s2 22.1-r3-s2.x
juniper / junos 22.1-r3-s3 22.1-r3-s3.x
juniper / junos 22.3 22.3.x
juniper / junos 22.3-r1 22.3-r1.x
juniper / junos 22.3-r1-s1 22.3-r1-s1.x
juniper / junos 22.3-r1-s2 22.3-r1-s2.x
juniper / junos 22.3-r2 22.3-r2.x
juniper / junos 22.3-r2-s1 22.3-r2-s1.x
juniper / junos 22.3-r2-s2 22.3-r2-s2.x
juniper / junos 22.3-r3 22.3-r3.x
juniper / junos 22.3-r3-s1 22.3-r3-s1.x
juniper / junos 22.3-r3-s2 22.3-r3-s2.x
juniper / junos 22.4 22.4.x
juniper / junos 22.4-r1 22.4-r1.x
juniper / junos 22.4-r1-s1 22.4-r1-s1.x
juniper / junos 22.4-r1-s2 22.4-r1-s2.x
juniper / junos 22.4-r2 22.4-r2.x
juniper / junos 22.4-r2-s1 22.4-r2-s1.x
juniper / junos 22.4-r2-s2 22.4-r2-s2.x
juniper / junos 22.4-r3 22.4-r3.x
juniper / junos 22.4-r3-s1 22.4-r3-s1.x
juniper / junos 23.2 23.2.x
juniper / junos 23.2-r1 23.2-r1.x
juniper / junos 23.2-r1-s1 23.2-r1-s1.x
juniper / junos 23.2-r1-s2 23.2-r1-s2.x
juniper / junos 23.4 23.4.x
juniper / junos 23.4-r1 23.4-r1.x
juniper / junos 23.4-r1-s1 23.4-r1-s1.x
juniper / junos 23.4-r1-s2 23.4-r1-s2.x

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.