Vulnerability Database

352,262

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2025-64719 — gogs.io/gogs

Improper Input Validation

Summary

A malicious user with rights to create a new file on a repository or wiki page can trigger a denial of service condition in which the pages containing the listing of files will return HTTP error 500 and render the web interface unusable for the repository or wiki.

Details

The issue is present in file internal/route/repo/wiki.go and internal/route/repo/view.go where the pages try to recover commit information. If errors are returned while recovering commit information, the page will return a 500 error and stop rendering, resulting in a denial of service. In view.go the issue occurs at line 56 while a slightly different issue occurs in wiki.go at line 174 where commits[0] is dereferenced without checking if it contains value. It is possible to trigger issues in assigning the correct value to variable commits by using a specific string as part of the page title. The issue is linked to the fact that file names can contain special characters such as *, ?, [, ], etc. that will be interpreted as git's pathspec instead of a simple string. So crafting a name containing an incomplete pathspec sequence will trigger this error.

PoC

As a proof of concept consider the file name "[] and how it affects repository and wiki pages. In the following images it is shown how pages are created, the error shown in the web page right after creation and the error as logged in the console.

<img width="835" height="503" alt="repo_creation" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cdee9625-33d9-42d3-a5fa-264fba4923ed" />

Figure 1: Creation of malicious file in repository

<img width="832" height="692" alt="repo_error_web" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/53c57366-8f45-4a0f-a2ac-86f4a08467cc" />

Figure 2: Malicious file in repository causes error 500

<img width="934" height="56" alt="repo_error_console" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/26427fc3-bead-4e41-a484-e2d53289a2da" />

Figure 3: Console error caused by malicious file in repository

<img width="835" height="503" alt="wiki_creation" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a5c9836-64e3-4824-b6e5-9f9a80e7f18a" />

Figure 4: Creation of malicious file in wiki

<img width="1001" height="463" alt="wiki_error_web" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/33c5a907-b81c-4157-bd37-33341412172a" />

Figure 5: Malicious file in wiki causes error 500

<img width="1018" height="537" alt="wiki_error_console" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9b0ab551-5720-4715-a2ac-f7310534f025" />

Figure 6: Console error caused by malicious file in wiki

Impact

The repository and wiki pages will not render when files named with the payload are present in the repository or in the wiki. This condition will be present as long as the malicious file is present in the repository or wiki. The issue will not cause a DoS condition when using the server via CLI.

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: Low
  • Score: 4.9
  • AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CWEs:

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.