CVE-2025-71078 — linux / linux_kernel
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
powerpc/64s/slb: Fix SLB multihit issue during SLB preload
On systems using the hash MMU, there is a software SLB preload cache that mirrors the entries loaded into the hardware SLB buffer. This preload cache is subject to periodic eviction — typically after every 256 context switches — to remove old entry.
To optimize performance, the kernel skips switch_mmu_context() in switch_mm_irqs_off() when the prev and next mm_struct are the same. However, on hash MMU systems, this can lead to inconsistencies between the hardware SLB and the software preload cache.
If an SLB entry for a process is evicted from the software cache on one CPU, and the same process later runs on another CPU without executing switch_mmu_context(), the hardware SLB may retain stale entries. If the kernel then attempts to reload that entry, it can trigger an SLB multi-hit error.
The following timeline shows how stale SLB entries are created and can cause a multi-hit error when a process moves between CPUs without a MMU context switch.
CPU 0 CPU 1
Process P exec swapper/1 load_elf_binary begin_new_exc activate_mm switch_mm_irqs_off switch_mmu_context switch_slb /* * This invalidates all * the entries in the HW * and setup the new HW * SLB entries as per the * preload cache. */ context_switch sched_migrate_task migrates process P to cpu-1
Process swapper/0 context switch (to process P) (uses mm_struct of Process P) switch_mm_irqs_off() switch_slb load_slb++ /* * load_slb becomes 0 here * and we evict an entry from * the preload cache with * preload_age(). We still * keep HW SLB and preload * cache in sync, that is * because all HW SLB entries * anyways gets evicted in * switch_slb during SLBIA. * We then only add those * entries back in HW SLB, * which are currently * present in preload_cache * (after eviction). */ load_elf_binary continues... setup_new_exec() slb_setup_new_exec()
sched_switch event
sched_migrate_task migrates
process P to cpu-0
context_switch from swapper/0 to Process P switch_mm_irqs_off() /*
- Since both prev and next mm struct are same we don't call
- switch_mmu_context(). This will cause the HW SLB and SW preload
- cache to go out of sync in preload_new_slb_context. Because there
- was an SLB entry which was evicted from both HW and preload cache
- on cpu-1. Now later in preload_new_slb_context(), when we will try
- to add the same preload entry again, we will add this to the SW
- preload cache and then will add it to the HW SLB. Since on cpu-0
- this entry was never invalidated, hence adding this entry to the HW
- SLB will cause a SLB multi-hit error. */ load_elf_binary cont ---truncated---
| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| linux / linux_kernel | 4.20.1 | 5.10.248 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 5.11 | 5.15.198 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 5.16 | 6.1.160 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.2 | 6.6.120 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.7 | 6.12.64 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.13 | 6.18.4 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 4.20 | 4.20.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.19-rc1 | 6.19-rc1.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.19-rc2 | 6.19-rc2.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.19-rc3 | 6.19-rc3.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.19-rc4 | 6.19-rc4.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.19-rc5 | 6.19-rc5.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.19-rc6 | 6.19-rc6.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.19-rc7 | 6.19-rc7.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.19-rc8 | 6.19-rc8.x |
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/00312419f0863964625d6dcda8183f96849412c6
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/01324c0328181b94cf390bda22ff91c75126ea57
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2e9a95d60f1df7b57618fd5ef057aef331575bd2
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4ae1e46d8a290319f33f71a2710a1382ba5431e8
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/895123c309a34d2cfccf7812b41e17261a3a6f37
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b13a3dbfa196af68eae2031f209743735ad416bf
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c9f865022a1823d814032a09906e91e4701a35fc
Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity
SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.
- No setup fees
- 5-min deployment
- Cancel anytime
Frequently Asked Questions
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.