Vulnerability Database

407,382

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2026-111751 — @angular / router

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

A denial of service (DoS) vulnerability was identified in @angular/router when Server-Side Rendering (SSR) is enabled on Node.js (V8) and RouterLink directives are rendered with queryParamsHandling: 'merge' or 'preserve', configured either per link or globally via defaultQueryParamsHandling.

Starting in v21.2.0 (angular/angular#66181), RouterLink internals were refactored to use signals, introducing a computed signal (_urlTree) that cached the returned UrlTree instance on the directive. Because each rendered link maintains an active RouterLink instance for the entire duration of the request lifecycle, the computed signal permanently pinned the UrlTree and its associated query parameter dictionary in the heap until the SSR response completed.

When query parameter handling is set to 'merge' or 'preserve', each link copies the incoming request's query parameters into its own UrlTree. During SSR, memory consumption scales multiplicatively:

$$\text{Heap Retention} \approx (\text{Number of affected links}) \times (\text{Size of parsed query parameter map})$$

Because parsed JavaScript objects and property dictionaries require substantially more heap space than the raw query string—particularly when property names trigger dense array allocations under V8 property-storage heuristics—an attacker can supply oversized query strings to amplify heap consumption by orders of magnitude per in-flight request.

Impact

Successful exploitation allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to exhaust the Node.js old-space heap with modest concurrent request volume, terminating the SSR worker with an unrecoverable JavaScript heap out of memory fatal crash.

  • Numeric Names Not Required: Numeric query parameter names trigger larger V8 property-storage allocations (~558 KB per parsed dictionary in tests vs. ~197 KB for non-numeric equivalents), lowering the concurrency threshold needed for a crash. However, non-numeric query parameters also produce significant heap amplification and can exhaust worker memory with proportionally higher concurrency.
  • Client-side SPAs Unaffected: Pure client-side Angular applications (Single Page Applications without SSR) are not vulnerable, as local browser memory consumption does not cross a security boundary.

Attack Preconditions & Vulnerable Configurations

An application is affected only if all of the following conditions are met:

  1. SSR Enabled: The application runs in a Server-Side Rendering environment powered by Node.js / V8.
  2. Merged or Preserved Query Parameters: RouterLink elements rendered during SSR use queryParamsHandling: 'merge' or 'preserve', either bound explicitly on links or configured application-wide via withRouterConfig({ defaultQueryParamsHandling: 'merge' }).
  3. Upstream Proxy Forwards Long Request Lines: Reverse proxies or load balancers (e.g., Nginx, AWS ALB, Cloudflare) forward long query strings to the Node.js application rather than rejecting them at the edge. (For example, Nginx's default 8 KB large_client_header_buffers limit rejects 16 KB request lines unless explicitly increased).
  4. Overlapping Renders: Because retained memory is freed once each request completes, multiple concurrent requests must be processed simultaneously in the same Node.js worker instance (such as pages awaiting asynchronous data fetching, route resolvers, or external API calls during SSR).

Exploit Payload Example

An attacker issues concurrent HTTP requests containing dense query parameters to an SSR page that renders multiple merged links:

GET /products?0&17&34&51&68&85&...&48042 HTTP/1.1 Host: example.com

Patches

The issue is resolved by removing persistent UrlTree retention from RouterLink (angular/angular#70953). RouterLink now tracks route dependencies directly in reactiveHref and discards intermediate UrlTree instances immediately after computing the serialized href string. The urlTree getter and click handlers compute UrlTree instances on demand.

As a result, intermediate query parameter maps are short-lived allocations collected during young-generation GC scavenges rather than remaining pinned in the heap for the lifetime of the request, restoring the memory profile of Angular 21.1 and earlier.

Patched versions:

  • 22.2.1
  • 21.2.25

Versions prior to 21.2.0 (including Angular 20.x LTS and 21.1.x) do not retain UrlTree instances in RouterLink and are not vulnerable to this issue.

Workarounds & Mitigations

If you cannot immediately upgrade to a patched version, apply one or more of the following mitigations:

  1. Avoid 'merge' and 'preserve' on Server-Rendered Links: Remove defaultQueryParamsHandling: 'merge' (or 'preserve') from global configuration. Explicitly bind only the specific query parameters each link requires (e.g., [queryParams]="{ filter: filter() }"). Even on patched versions, this practice prevents unnecessary request-derived parameter propagation into generated DOM markup.

  2. Limit Query String Length at Reverse Proxy or Middleware: Configure your edge proxy, web application firewall (WAF), or reverse proxy to reject requests with excessively long query strings (e.g., exceeding 2,048 bytes).

    Alternatively, reject oversized query strings in Node.js before Angular SSR handles the request:

    // server.ts (before Angular SSR handler) app.use((req, res, next) => { const queryIndex = req.url.indexOf('?'); if (queryIndex !== -1 && req.url.length - queryIndex > 2048) { res.status(414).send('URI Too Long'); return; } next(); });
  3. Increase Node.js Old Space: Increasing --max-old-space-size (e.g., to 2048 MB or 4096 MB) increases the memory headroom and the concurrency threshold required to exhaust memory, though it does not fully eliminate vulnerability under sustained traffic.

No technical information available.

Is CVE-2026-111751 exposed on your perimeter?

A vulnerability database tells you what is broken. Attack surface management tells you where it is running: it discovers your internet-facing assets and flags the ones affected by issues like this one.

What is attack surface management? →

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.