A denial of service (DoS) vulnerability was identified in @angular/router when Server-Side Rendering (SSR) is enabled on Node.js (V8).
During route recognition, @angular/router fails to validate whether an auxiliary outlet segment in the URL matches a route configured for that specific outlet name. Because unconfigured empty-path outlet groups (such as a:/(), x:/(...), or ///(...)) are not rejected during matching, the router repeatedly re-evaluates the route configuration against each arbitrary outlet segment provided in the URL.
When a request URL contains multiple arbitrary empty-path outlet segments, this improper matching forces the router to instantiate duplicate ActivatedRouteSnapshot trees, repeatedly execute canMatch guards and route resolvers, and allocate separate copies of route parameters and queryParams for each unconfigured outlet.
An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this behavior by sending requests with crafted outlet segments to exhaust the Node.js memory heap or overwhelm CPU resources, leading to SSR worker termination and service disruption.
Successful exploitation allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to exhaust the Node.js heap with a single crafted request or a small number of concurrent requests, terminating the SSR worker process with a fatal JavaScript heap out-of-memory crash. When the matched routes declare canMatch guards or resolvers, a single short request can also trigger repeated guard or resolver executions, increasing load on backend services and holding worker connections open.
An application is affected only if all of the following conditions are met:
path: "") route (e.g., {path: "", component: ShopPage}), or{path: "dashboard", children: [{path: ":id", outlet: "detail", component: DetailPanel}]}).Against a configuration with empty-path (path: "") routes and query parameters:
GET /shop/(a:/()//b:/()//c:/()//...)?param1=value&param2=value... HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Against a configuration with named-outlet or sibling routes:
GET /dashboard/(detail:1//x:/(detail:1//x:/(...)//y:/(...))//y:/(...)) HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
The issue is resolved in angular/angular#71055. The router now requires every child outlet segment group to match a route configured for its target outlet before unwrapping child segments or completing a match, and prevents unconfigured empty-path outlet groups from matching routes declared for other outlets.
Patched versions:
22.2.121.2.2520.3.33Versions prior to v20 are also affected but are no longer supported and will not receive a patch.
If you cannot immediately upgrade to a patched version, apply one or more of the following mitigations:
Reject Parenthesized or Empty-Path Outlet URLs in Middleware or WAF (Recommended):
In @angular/router, auxiliary outlet groups in a URL always use parentheses (...), and empty-path outlet groups in a URL always take the form :/( , (/ , or ///( .
( or ) before Angular SSR handles the request.:/( , (/ , or ///( ).Unlike URL length limits, this completely blocks both heap exhaustion and short-URL guard/resolver amplification:
// server.ts (placed before Angular SSR handler)
app.use((req, res, next) => {
let pathname: string;
try {
pathname = decodeURI(req.url.split(/[?#]/, 1)[0]);
} catch {
res.status(400).send("Bad Request");
return;
}
// Option A: If the app does not use named outlets in URLs, block all parenthesized groups:
if (/[()]/.test(pathname)) {
res.status(400).send("Bad Request");
return;
}
// Option B: If the app uses named outlets, block only empty-path outlet groups:
if (/:\/\(|\(\//\(|\/\/\/\(/.test(pathname)) {
res.status(400).send("Bad Request");
return;
}
next();
});
Limit URL Length at Reverse Proxy or Middleware: Configure your edge proxy, web application firewall (WAF), or reverse proxy to reject requests with excessively long URLs (e.g., exceeding 2,048 bytes). The outlet portion of the payload is in the path, so limit the full request target, not only the query string. This reduces, but does not eliminate, guard/resolver amplification, which requires only a short URL.
Increase Node.js Old Space:
Increasing --max-old-space-size raises the request size and concurrency required to exhaust memory, though it does not eliminate the issue.
| Software | Affected versions |
|---|---|
@angular / router
|
>= 22.0.0, < 22.2.1 |
@angular / router
|
>= 21.0.0, < 21.2.25 |
@angular / router
|
>= 20.0.0, < 20.3.33 |
@angular / router
|
<= 19.2.25 |
A vulnerability database tells you what is broken. Attack surface management tells you where it is running: it discovers your internet-facing assets and flags the ones affected by issues like this one.
What is attack surface management? →A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.