CVE-2026-122053 — sensiolabs / symfony
Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object AttributesThe Symfony Serializer component ObjectNormalizer treats any attribute name containing . (and, from Symfony 6.4, [) as a writable property path, allowing untrusted input to modify properties of nested objects and bypass their #[Ignore] metadata attribute in Symfony versions 5.4.41 prior to 5.4.56, 6.4.9 prior to 6.4.50, 7.0.9 prior to 7.1.0, 7.1.2 prior to 7.4.23, and 8.x prior to 8.1.11. ObjectNormalizer::isAllowedAttribute() accepts such names, and setAttributeValue() hands the name straight to PropertyAccessor::setValue(), which parses it as a property path and traverses into the nested object. A payload key such as customer.admin writes to $order->customer->admin. The #[Ignore] metadata attribute is only consulted when the nested object is denormalized in its own right, never when it is reached through a path. #[Groups] restrictions are not bypassed: the path is only accepted when no groups are passed in the context, and then groups restrict nothing. When the root class carries neither #[Ignore] nor #[Groups], no allowlist applies and every key of the payload is let through. Because PropertyAccessor also resolves a path segment against public methods, a segment matching a public method name invokes that method with the attacker’s value.Applications that bind untrusted input to objects are affected, including controllers using #[MapRequestPayload] or #[MapQueryString], whose default normalizer is ObjectNormalizer. With OBJECT_TO_POPULATE, as used for partial updates, the traversal reaches an already hydrated entity graph, and the modified field may be persisted.
The fix accepts a property path only when the class metadata declares an attribute of that exact name. Declared paths keep working unchanged, and a path in the payload with no matching declaration is ignored.
| Software | Affected versions |
|---|---|
| sensiolabs / symfony | >= 5.4.41, < 5.4.56 |
| sensiolabs / symfony | >= 6.4.9, < 6.4.50 |
| sensiolabs / symfony | >= 7.0.9, < 7.1.0 |
| sensiolabs / symfony | >= 7.1.2, < 7.4.23 |
| sensiolabs / symfony | >= 8.0.0, < 8.1.11 |
Is CVE-2026-122053 exposed on your perimeter?
A vulnerability database tells you what is broken. Attack surface management tells you where it is running: it discovers your internet-facing assets and flags the ones affected by issues like this one.
What is attack surface management? →
Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity
SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.
- No setup fees
- 5-min deployment
- Cancel anytime
Frequently Asked Questions
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.