CVE-2026-43050 — linux / linux_kernel
Use After FreeIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
atm: lec: fix use-after-free in sock_def_readable()
A race condition exists between lec_atm_close() setting priv->lecd to NULL and concurrent access to priv->lecd in send_to_lecd(), lec_handle_bridge(), and lec_atm_send(). When the socket is freed via RCU while another thread is still using it, a use-after-free occurs in sock_def_readable() when accessing the socket's wait queue.
The root cause is that lec_atm_close() clears priv->lecd without any synchronization, while callers dereference priv->lecd without any protection against concurrent teardown.
Fix this by converting priv->lecd to an RCU-protected pointer:
- Mark priv->lecd as __rcu in lec.h
- Use rcu_assign_pointer() in lec_atm_close() and lecd_attach() for safe pointer assignment
- Use rcu_access_pointer() for NULL checks that do not dereference the pointer in lec_start_xmit(), lec_push(), send_to_lecd() and lecd_attach()
- Use rcu_read_lock/rcu_dereference/rcu_read_unlock in send_to_lecd(), lec_handle_bridge() and lec_atm_send() to safely access lecd
- Use rcu_assign_pointer() followed by synchronize_rcu() in lec_atm_close() to ensure all readers have completed before proceeding. This is safe since lec_atm_close() is called from vcc_release() which holds lock_sock(), a sleeping lock.
- Remove the manual sk_receive_queue drain from lec_atm_close() since vcc_destroy_socket() already drains it after lec_atm_close() returns.
v2: Switch from spinlock + sock_hold/put approach to RCU to properly fix the race. The v1 spinlock approach had two issues pointed out by Eric Dumazet: 1. priv->lecd was still accessed directly after releasing the lock instead of using a local copy. 2. The spinlock did not prevent packets being queued after lec_atm_close() drains sk_receive_queue since timer and workqueue paths bypass netif_stop_queue().
Note: Syzbot patch testing was attempted but the test VM terminated unexpectedly with "Connection to localhost closed by remote host", likely due to a QEMU AHCI emulation issue unrelated to this fix. Compile testing with "make W=1 net/atm/lec.o" passes cleanly.
| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| linux / linux_kernel | 2.6.12.1 | 5.10.253 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 5.11 | 5.15.203 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 5.16 | 6.1.168 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.2 | 6.6.134 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.7 | 6.12.81 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.13 | 6.18.22 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.19 | 6.19.12 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 2.6.12 | 2.6.12.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 2.6.12-rc2 | 2.6.12-rc2.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 2.6.12-rc3 | 2.6.12-rc3.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 2.6.12-rc4 | 2.6.12-rc4.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 2.6.12-rc5 | 2.6.12-rc5.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 7.0-rc1 | 7.0-rc1.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 7.0-rc2 | 7.0-rc2.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 7.0-rc3 | 7.0-rc3.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 7.0-rc4 | 7.0-rc4.x |
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/317843d5355062020649124eb4a0d7acbcc3f53e
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3989740fa4978e1d2d51ecc62be1b01093e104ad
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3e8b25f32f2f35549d03d77da030a24a45bdef5b
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5fbbb1ff936d7ff9528d929c1549977e8123d8a8
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/750a33f417f3d196b86375f8d9f8938bacf130fe
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/922814879542c2e397b0e9641fd36b8202a8e555
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/abc10f85a3965ac14b9ed7ad3e67b35604a63aa3
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b256d055da47258e63f8b40965f276c5f23d229a
Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity
SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.
- No setup fees
- 5-min deployment
- Cancel anytime
Frequently Asked Questions
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.