CVE-2026-43315 — linux / linux_kernel
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: nSVM: Remove a user-triggerable WARN on nested_svm_load_cr3() succeeding
Drop the WARN in svm_set_nested_state() on nested_svm_load_cr3() failing as it is trivially easy to trigger from userspace by modifying CPUID after loading CR3. E.g. modifying the state restoration selftest like so:
--- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/state_test.c +++ tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/state_test.c @@ -280,7 +280,16 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
/* Restore state in a new VM. */
vcpu = vm_recreate_with_one_vcpu(vm);
-
vcpu_load_state(vcpu, state);
-
if (stage == 4) { -
state->sregs.cr3 = BIT(44); -
vcpu_load_state(vcpu, state); -
vcpu_set_cpuid_property(vcpu, X86_PROPERTY_MAX_PHY_ADDR, 36); -
__vcpu_nested_state_set(vcpu, &state->nested); -
} else { -
vcpu_load_state(vcpu, state); -
} /* * Restore XSAVE state in a dummy vCPU, first without doing
generates:
WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 938 at arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c:1877 svm_set_nested_state+0x34a/0x360 [kvm_amd] Modules linked in: kvm_amd kvm irqbypass [last unloaded: kvm] CPU: 30 UID: 1000 PID: 938 Comm: state_test Tainted: G W 6.18.0-rc7-58e10b63777d-next-vm Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:svm_set_nested_state+0x34a/0x360 [kvm_amd] Call Trace: <TASK> kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0xf33/0x1700 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x4e6/0x8f0 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8f/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x61/0xad0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
Simply delete the WARN instead of trying to prevent userspace from shoving "illegal" state into CR3. For better or worse, KVM's ABI allows userspace to set CPUID after SREGS, and vice versa, and KVM is very permissive when it comes to guest CPUID. I.e. attempting to enforce the virtual CPU model when setting CPUID could break userspace. Given that the WARN doesn't provide any meaningful protection for KVM or benefit for userspace, simply drop it even though the odds of breaking userspace are minuscule.
Opportunistically delete a spurious newline.
| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| linux / linux_kernel | 5.14 | 5.15.202 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 5.16 | 6.1.165 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.2 | 6.6.128 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.7 | 6.12.75 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.13 | 6.18.16 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.19 | 6.19.6 |
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/155ec243ef726f4bc49536fa0bfb565dc011ab17
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/580ea57840864d40e019bc13fd26afdc8d510a2f
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/969e5e13ff5c18603f21d1f9f64ec9194e141ac0
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce904c8a5bbe697eae0f7e34b07095bd7a6dee19
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/deb8f6dfd31d94b18dbeeaa8c01fbec5fc70fd2b
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ebb2ab4f1c87d6b52776292cf7dc16aea48e95f8
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fc3ba56385d03501eb582e4b86691ba378e556f9
Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity
SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.
- No setup fees
- 5-min deployment
- Cancel anytime
Frequently Asked Questions
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.