A participant manager can access and modify the CSV census record admin forms.
The CSV census admin record-management surface under /admin/csv_census/census_logs does not enforce admin-only authorization before rendering or mutating Decidim::Verifications::CsvDatum.
A participant manager (which can only manage participants) can therefore open the admin forms, create or update census rows, and delete rows directly.
Reproduction steps:
http://localhost:3000/admin/csv_census/census_logs/new_record in the browser. Confirm the create form loads even though the session is not a full admin.<img width="1541" height="274" alt="decidim-census-01" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/859ee101-746f-4acb-8051-27036689f1b3" />
<img width="1538" height="363" alt="decidim-census-02" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/85bbb004-a999-46dc-856c-fd32b50ced2c" />
Note that normal participant accounts were not able to access the CSV census records which is good.
Any participant admin can create, alter, or remove CSV census rows, which can corrupt verification data relied on by authorization workflows.
See https://github.com/decidim/decidim/pull/16674 and https://github.com/decidim/decidim/pull/16703
Disable Organization Census verification method
OWASP A01:2021 Broken Access Control
This issue was discovered in a security audit organized by the Decidim Association and made by Radically Open Security against Decidim financed by NGI.
| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
decidim-verifications
|
- | 0.30.9 |
decidim-verifications
|
0.31.0.rc1 | 0.31.5 |
decidim-verifications
|
0.32.0.rc1 | 0.32.0 |
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.