Vulnerability Database

352,262

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2026-48010 — shopware / platform

Improper Privilege Management

UserController::upsertUser() writes user data in SYSTEM_SCOPE and does not filter the admin field. A non-admin API user with user:create or user:update ACL permission can set admin: true on new or existing users, escalating to full admin access.

The Problem

In src/Core/Framework/Api/Controller/UserController.php, line 210-234:

public function upsertUser(?string $userId, Request $request, Context $context, ResponseFactoryInterface $factory): Response { $data = $request->request->all(); // raw request data, no field filtering // ... $events = $context->scope(Context::SYSTEM_SCOPE, fn (Context $context) => $this->userRepository->upsert([$data], $context) ); }

SYSTEM_SCOPE bypasses AclWriteValidator entirely (line 52 of AclWriteValidator::preValidate() returns early for SYSTEM_SCOPE). The admin boolean field is accepted without restriction.

Compare with IntegrationController::upsertIntegration() in the same codebase, which correctly checks:

if ((!$source instanceof AdminApiSource) || (!$source->isAdmin() && isset($data['admin'])) ) { throw new PermissionDeniedException(); }

UserController is missing this exact check.

Impact

Any API user with the low-privilege user:create permission can create accounts with full admin access, or with user:update can promote any existing user to admin. This is a direct privilege escalation.

Suggested Fix

Add the same isAdmin() check from IntegrationController:

$source = $context->getSource(); if ((!$source instanceof AdminApiSource) || (!$source->isAdmin() && isset($data['admin']))) { throw new PermissionDeniedException(); }

Best regards, Keyvan Hardani

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: Medium
  • Score: 6.5
  • AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

CWEs:

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.