Vulnerability Database

361,925

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2026-48118 — nukeviet / nukeviet

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Summary

Reflected XSS in the Comment module via the status_comment URL parameter. The parameter accepts attacker-controlled base64-encoded HTML/JavaScript that is decoded server-side and rendered unescaped into the page. Compounded by a second flaw: the checkss anti-forgery token was derived from a site-wide static value (NV_CACHE_PREFIX) instead of a per-session value, making the token reusable across all users and allowing the attack to be delivered via a simple crafted URL.

Details

Vulnerability 1 — Reflected XSS via status_comment

Affected components:

  • modules/comment/funcs/main.php — parameter ingestion
  • modules/comment/comment.php — decode and template assignment
  • themes/*/modules/comment/comment.tpl — raw render

The status_comment GET/POST parameter is sanitised with get_title(), which applies strip_tags(). Because the parameter is intended to carry a base64-encoded string, its character set ([A-Za-z0-9-_,]) passes through strip_tags() unchanged. The value is later decoded with nv_base64_decode() and assigned to the template variable STATUS_COMMENT without any escaping, which the template then renders raw inside a <div>.

The fundamental flaw is ordering: the filter is applied to the encoded form of the data, before decoding, so it is entirely ineffective against whatever the decoded content contains. Any HTML or JavaScript payload, once base64-encoded, survives the filter and executes in the victim's browser.

Vulnerability 2 — Session-independent checkss token

Affected components:

  • modules/comment/comment.php — token validation in comment-load and comment-module functions
  • modules/comment/funcs/post.php — token validation when posting
  • All caller modules that generate a checkss before invoking the comment system (e.g. modules/news, modules/page)

The checkss token required to load the comment block was computed by hashing the resource parameters together with NV_CACHE_PREFIX:

checkss = md5(module + area + id + allowed + NV_CACHE_PREFIX)

NV_CACHE_PREFIX is a static, site-wide constant — identical for every visitor — derived at install time from the site key and server name. The token therefore has the same value for all users viewing the same article and never changes between sessions.

This token is printed into the public HTML of every page that includes a comment block (as a data-checkss attribute on the comment container). Because the token is not session-bound, an attacker can read it from the page source and reuse it in a crafted URL targeting any other user.

The correct pattern, used consistently elsewhere in the codebase (e.g. modules/contact, modules/banners), is to derive the token from NV_CHECK_SESSION:

NV_CHECK_SESSION = md5(NV_CACHE_PREFIX + session_id)

This binds the token to the current session, so a token obtained by the attacker is invalid for any other user's session.

Attack scenario

  1. Attacker opens any article with a comment block and reads the checkss value from the HTML source.
  2. Attacker constructs a payload (e.g. a credential-phishing overlay) and base64-encodes it.
  3. Attacker delivers the following URL to the victim: https://<target>/index.php?language=vi&nv=comment&comment_load=1 &module=news&area=<area>&id=<id>&allowed=<allowed> &checkss=<value_from_step_1> &status_comment=<base64_payload>
  4. When the victim opens the URL, the decoded payload renders in their browser within the site's origin, with access to cookies, session storage, and the ability to make authenticated requests.

Verified impact: A phishing overlay form was confirmed to transmit captured plaintext credentials to an attacker-controlled server. No authentication is required at any step.

CSP note: NukeViet's Content-Security-Policy includes script-src 'unsafe-inline' and does not restrict navigation, so the policy does not prevent exploitation.

CVSS 3.1

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N Base Score: 8.2 (High)

| Metric | Value | Rationale | |--------|-------|-----------| | Attack Vector | Network | Exploitable remotely via crafted URL | | Attack Complexity | Low | checkss readable from public HTML; no special setup required | | Privileges Required | None | No authentication needed | | User Interaction | Required | Victim must open the crafted URL | | Scope | Changed | JavaScript executes in victim's browser, crossing the application security boundary | | Confidentiality | High | Full plaintext credential capture demonstrated via phishing overlay | | Integrity | Low | DOM manipulation and authenticated requests possible; no direct backend write access | | Availability | None | No denial-of-service impact |

Patches

Both root causes are addressed:

Fix 1 — Bind checkss to user session: Replace NV_CACHE_PREFIX with NV_CHECK_SESSION in all locations that generate or validate the comment checkss token — both inside the comment module itself and in any caller module that constructs the token before invoking the comment system. With a session-bound token, a value obtained by the attacker is invalid for any other user's session, removing the delivery mechanism for this attack.

Fix 2 — Escape decoded output before rendering: Apply nv_htmlspecialchars() to the result of nv_base64_decode($status_comment) before assigning it to the template. This closes the XSS sink as an independent defence-in-depth measure, remaining effective regardless of how the code path is reached.

Fix 1 alone eliminates the exploitability of this specific vector. Fix 2 is a necessary defence-in-depth layer that closes the underlying sink.

CWE

  • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (Cross-site Scripting)
  • CWE-565: Reliance on Cookies without Validation and Integrity Checking (contributing factor — session-independent token)

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: High
  • Score: 8.2
  • AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.