Vulnerability Database

352,427

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2026-48760 — symfony / html-sanitizer

Insufficient Visual Distinction of Homoglyphs Presented to User

Description

Symfony\Component\HtmlSanitizer\TextSanitizer\UrlSanitizer::parse() rejects URLs containing raw Unicode explicit-direction BiDi formatting characters (U+202A–U+202E, U+2066–U+2069) as a defense against visual-spoofing of the rendered href. The check covers only the raw UTF-8 forms of those code points: the percent-encoded forms (%E2%80%AE for U+202E, %E2%81%A6 for U+2066, etc.) are not matched by the deny regex, survive league/uri's parse/build cycle, and are re-emitted unchanged in the sanitized URL. Any downstream consumer that decodes the link before display — phishing-detection filters that compare urldecode($href) against a domain allow-list, audit-log dashboards that show a decoded form for readability, hover-tooltip previews, federated/syndicated content where the decoder lives on the consuming side — restores the BiDi character and the visual spoof that the original defense was filed to prevent.

The same UrlSanitizer::parse() carries an ASCII-only /\s/ whitespace check (no /u modifier) intended as a backstop against malformed URLs. Without the /u modifier, PCRE's \s matches only ASCII whitespace, so Unicode whitespace characters — NBSP (U+00A0), the zero-width no-break space / BOM (U+FEFF), line/paragraph separators (U+2028, U+2029), ogham space (U+1680), the U+2000–U+200A en/em quad family, narrow / medium / ideographic spaces (U+202F, U+205F, U+3000) and NEL (U+0085) — pass through unchanged in both raw and percent-encoded forms. In hostname positions they enable lookalike spoofs (example<NBSP>.com); in path/query/fragment they enable allow-list drift when a downstream consumer strips whitespace before comparison.

Resolution

UrlSanitizer::parse() now denies BiDi formatting marks together with Unicode whitespace and the zero-width no-break space, in both the raw input and the percent-decoded form of each parsed URL component (user, pass, host, path, query, fragment). ASCII space remains tolerated in path/query/fragment via the existing percent-encoding step.

The patches for this issue are available here for branch 6.4 (and forward-ported to 7.4, 8.0 and 8.1).

Credits

Symfony would like to thank Scott Arciszewski (Trail of Bits) for reporting the issue and Nicolas Grekas for providing the fix.

No technical information available.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.