The official Kimai Docker image ships with APP_SECRET=change_this_to_something_unique as the default environment variable. The Docker entrypoint does not override or validate this value. Any Kimai instance deployed using the Docker image without explicitly setting APP_SECRET runs with a publicly-known Symfony kernel.secret, enabling an unauthenticated attacker to forge HMAC-signed cookies and login links to take over any account including super_admin.
Dockerfile:263 sets ENV APP_SECRET=change_this_to_something_unique. This value is consumed by config/packages/framework.yaml:7 as kernel.secret, which Symfony uses to HMAC-sign:
KIMAI_REMEMBER remember-me cookieThe .docker/entrypoint.sh does not check for or replace the default sentinel value. The bare-metal .env.dist:38 ships the same default. No startup-time guard exists anywhere in the codebase that refuses to start when APP_SECRET equals the sentinel.
User IDs are sequential integers starting from 1. The first super_admin account is almost always id=1. User IDs are visible in some URLs and API responses.
A PoC was provided, but removed for security reasons.
Any Kimai instance deployed via the official Docker image without overriding APP_SECRET can be compromised from the internet. An unauthenticated attacker who can reach the Kimai URL can forge authentication tokens and log in as any user if:
APP_SECRET via bin2hex(random_bytes(32)) which will be stored in /opt/kimai/var/data/.appsecret/opt/kimai/.env.local containing the APP_SECRET, either fetched from the Docker Environment or from the newly created secret fileAPP_SECRETAPP_SECRET=change_this_to_something_uniqueAPP_SECRET=change_this_to_something_uniqueSee https://www.kimai.org/en/security/ghsa-jr9p-4h4j-6c58 for more information.
| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
kimai / kimai
|
- | 2.58.0 |
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.