CVE-2026-53161 — linux / linux_kernel
Use After FreeIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
misc: fastrpc: fix use-after-free of fastrpc_user in workqueue context
There is a race between fastrpc_device_release() and the workqueue that processes DSP responses. When the user closes the file descriptor, fastrpc_device_release() frees the fastrpc_user structure. Concurrently, an in-flight DSP invocation can complete and fastrpc_rpmsg_callback() schedules context cleanup via schedule_work(&ctx->put_work). If the workqueue runs fastrpc_context_free() in parallel with or after fastrpc_device_release() has freed the user structure, it dereferences the freed fastrpc_user. Depending on the state of the context at the time of the race, any one of the following accesses can be hit:
-
fastrpc_buf_free() calls fastrpc_ipa_to_dma_addr(buf->fl->cctx, ...) to strip the SID bits from the stored IOVA before passing the physical address to dma_free_coherent().
-
fastrpc_free_map() reads map->fl->cctx->vmperms[0].vmid to reconstruct the source permission bitmask needed for the qcom_scm_assign_mem() call that returns memory from the DSP VM back to HLOS.
-
fastrpc_free_map() acquires map->fl->lock to safely remove the map node from the fl->maps list.
The resulting use-after-free manifests as:
pc : fastrpc_buf_free+0x38/0x80 [fastrpc] lr : fastrpc_context_free+0xa8/0x1b0 [fastrpc] fastrpc_context_free+0xa8/0x1b0 [fastrpc] fastrpc_context_put_wq+0x78/0xa0 [fastrpc] process_one_work+0x180/0x450 worker_thread+0x26c/0x388
Add kref-based reference counting to fastrpc_user. Have each invoke context take a reference on the user at allocation time and release it when the context is freed. Release the initial reference in fastrpc_device_release() at file close. Move the teardown of the user structure — freeing pending contexts, maps, mmaps, and the channel context reference — into the kref release callback fastrpc_user_free(), so that it runs only when the last reference is dropped, regardless of whether that happens at device close or after the final in-flight context completes.
| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| linux / linux_kernel | 5.1 | 5.10.259 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 5.11 | 5.15.210 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 5.16 | 6.1.176 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.2 | 6.6.143 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.7 | 6.12.94 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.13 | 6.18.36 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 6.19 | 7.0.13 |
| linux / linux_kernel | 7.1-rc1 | 7.1-rc1.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 7.1-rc2 | 7.1-rc2.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 7.1-rc3 | 7.1-rc3.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 7.1-rc4 | 7.1-rc4.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 7.1-rc5 | 7.1-rc5.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 7.1-rc6 | 7.1-rc6.x |
| linux / linux_kernel | 7.1-rc7 | 7.1-rc7.x |
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5278ccd357e0d7aeeb1e76c0f3e0e02894a9897c
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6e5c2be09f814377d7f1ce97370a5b7b3e02814
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d42679eef34dd590b694ce3b666c5e2ba10cd4bf
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/df08fadcf0e5f3708365ec3b6d30b5aafd98bea1
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e1e3a05efe5954d5bad01157d79429d39a67a7ae
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e85eb5feca8e254905ffa6c57a3c99c89a674a0f
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ecea4967c2bff92c2fafbc59893f711b39f7b152
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fbe0947420eec18a84638d29468c2d563ce4e6a3
Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity
SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.
- No setup fees
- 5-min deployment
- Cancel anytime
Frequently Asked Questions
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.