Vulnerability Database

361,925

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2026-55252 — github.com/openrundev/openrun

URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')

Summary

The restrictions on redirect URLs in openrun can be bypassed by attackers, leading to open redirect attacks.

Details

In the current project, the referrer header value is used for subsequent redirects, so there is currently a validation for this redirect value. The current validation logic requires that the host and schema of the redirect URL be the same as the current website's URL, and finally, the path part is used for redirection. This check seems robust, but it can still be bypassed by attackers.

<img width="1606" height="1346" alt="QQ20260602-140205-2-2" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/83c549f3-38d7-444d-90f0-131d806f67ff" />

Here's the problem: Assuming the current website is http://127.0.0.1:25222/, if the attacker passes in a redirect URL of http://127.0.0.1:25222//fushuling.com, its host and schema are obviously the same as the current website, thus bypassing the verification. However, the issue lies in the final redirect URL, which is the path part of the URL, i.e., //fushuling.com.

Browsers automatically complete the HTTP header for URLs starting with //, ultimately successfully bypassing the restriction and redirecting to the external address http://fushuling.com.

This vulnerable behavior was successfully reproduced locally. Normally, specifying an external address directly will be blocked, so it will not redirect.

<img width="1587" height="717" alt="QQ20260602-140756-2-3" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/51430c42-bd10-401b-9c9f-27a91a0bc648" />

However, if the redirect URL is http://127.0.0.1:25222//fushuling.com, the existing validation logic is bypassed, and the Location header is successfully set to //fushuling.com.

POST /redirecttest/abc/frag HTTP/1.1 Host: 127.0.0.1:25222 Referer: http://127.0.0.1:25222//fushuling.com Cache-Control: max-age=0 sec-ch-ua: &quot;Not(A:Brand&quot;;v=&quot;24&quot;, &quot;Chromium&quot;;v=&quot;122&quot; sec-ch-ua-mobile: ?0 sec-ch-ua-platform: &quot;Windows&quot; Upgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/122.0.6261.57 Safari/537.36 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/avif,image/webp,image/apng,*/*;q=0.8,application/signed-exchange;v=b3;q=0.7 Sec-Fetch-Site: none Sec-Fetch-Mode: navigate Sec-Fetch-User: ?1 Sec-Fetch-Dest: document Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br Accept-Language: zh-CN,zh;q=0.9 Connection: close Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Content-Length: 0

<img width="1536" height="729" alt="QQ20260602-140925-2-4" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/31fde919-5f90-409f-8b14-af6c9c71761b" />

The user was then successfully redirected to the external address http://fushuling.com.

<img width="1692" height="855" alt="QQ20260602-141005-2-5" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/83b43ef6-52fa-4218-908b-7795394ae707" />

PoC

http://127.0.0.1:25222//fushuling.com

Impact

Open Redirect

No technical information available.

CWEs:

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.