CVE-2026-55426 — linuxfabrik-lib
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')Summary
When a check plugin places user provided input inside a command which is passed to shell_exec, an attacker can abuse this to run arbitrary commands. This is mainly dangerous for plugins which are listed in the sudoers file, because this allows an attacker controlling the nagios user to get root privileges.
Details
An example for this is the restic-check plugin, where the --repo argument is placed inside the command argument of shell_exec. As an example, an attacker could use the --repo argument |touch /root/nagios-was-here|. The full restic command is assembled to the string restic --json --repo=|touch /root/nagios-was-here| --password-file= check before it is passed to shell_exec. shell_exec then splits the command up in three parts at the | boundaries and executes the parts separately, which also executes the embedded command touch /root/nagios-was-here.
PoC
This PoC shows how the nagios user can use this to create a file inside /root.
nagios@test-vm:/$ sudo /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/restic-check --repo '|touch /root/nagios-was-here|'
Impact
The vulnerability is a local privilege escalation.
Fix
Switch from | to an array
Remove the | split functionality. Instead, modify shell_exec to accept either a string or an array of strings. If an array is provided, the commands are chained together like they currently are when using |. If a string is provided, no split should be performed. You could also introduce a separate function like shell_exec_with_user_input() which implements this such that the current shell_exec function can stay like it is.
This leaves the problem that an attacker can still specify arbitrary arguments inside a command. An example for this would be to use the --repo argument sftp://example.com --cache-dir /tmp, which would lead to the execution of: restic --json --repo=sftp://example.com --cache-dir /tmp --password-file=None check. Please note that this example should mainly highlight the problem in general. To prevent the problem, there is either escaping or again array-syntax. Escaping would use shlex.quote to place the user provided argument inside quotes and which also escapes everything which needs to be escaped. Using array syntax would mean providing the full command as an array like ['restic', '--json', '--repo', 'sftp://example.com']. The array can then be given as-is to Popen. With this method, the proposed shell_exec_with_user_input would accept an array of array of strings.
Patches
The fix follows the array-syntax approach proposed above:
linuxfabrik-lib5.0.0:lib.shell.shell_exec()requires the command as a list of arguments (argv) and always runs withshell=False. The|split functionality, command strings and theshell=parameter have been removed, so user-provided input can no longer break out of a command.lib.shell.safe_cli_value()additionally guards positional arguments (such as an ssh destination or a ping target) against option injection, andlib.sshbuilds argument lists as well.- Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins: all plugins assemble their external commands as argv lists (commit 23bb570f4). Contained in every release after v5.2.0.
| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
linuxfabrik-lib
|
- | 5.0.0 |
Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity
SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.
- No setup fees
- 5-min deployment
- Cancel anytime
Frequently Asked Questions
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.