Vulnerability Database

375,699

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2026-57112 — praisonaiagents

Missing Authentication for Critical Function

PraisonAI ToolsMCPServer legacy SSE transport accepts attacker Host/Origin and exposes registered tools

Summary

praisonaiagents.mcp.ToolsMCPServer.run_sse() builds a Starlette MCP HTTP+SSE server around mcp.server.sse.SseServerTransport. The server exposes /sse and /messages/, but it does not validate Origin, does not validate Host, and does not require any authentication.

This is reachable through supported PraisonAI code paths that wrap configured MCP server tools and re-expose them over legacy SSE:

  • praisonai mcp run <name> --transport sse
  • praisonai serve mcp --name <name> --transport sse
  • direct use of ToolsMCPServer(...).run_sse(...) or launch_tools_mcp_server(..., transport="sse")

A malicious website can use DNS rebinding against a local or internal PraisonAI SSE MCP server and send requests with attacker-controlled Host and Origin headers. The local PoV binds only to 127.0.0.1, sends an attacker Host and Origin, lists the registered tool, and invokes it successfully.

The same attacker Origin is rejected by PraisonAI's current Streamable HTTP transport with HTTP 403. The vulnerability is therefore a sibling transport guard gap in the legacy SSE wrapper, not intended behavior.

Affected product

  • Repository: MervinPraison/PraisonAI
  • Packages:
    • praisonaiagents
    • praisonai
  • Primary component: src/praisonai-agents/praisonaiagents/mcp/mcp_server.py
  • CLI wrappers:
    • src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/commands/mcp.py
    • src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/commands/serve.py
  • Latest verified release/current head:
    • praisonaiagents 1.6.58
    • PraisonAI 4.6.58
    • repo head 1ad58ca02975ff1398efeda694ea2ab78f20cf3e

Suggested affected ranges:

  • praisonaiagents >= 0.6.0, <= 1.6.58
  • praisonai >= 3.10.0, <= 4.6.58

No fixed version is known at submission time.

Confirmed source sweep:

v3.0.0 ToolsMCPServer.run_sse helper present, no Origin/Host/auth checks v3.10.0 praisonai mcp run --transport sse wraps configured tools into helper v3.12.3 praisonai serve mcp --name --transport sse wraps configured tools v4.0.0 same vulnerable helper and CLI wrapping paths v4.4.12 same vulnerable helper and CLI wrapping paths v4.5.0 same vulnerable helper and CLI wrapping paths v4.5.56 same vulnerable helper and CLI wrapping paths v4.5.139 same vulnerable helper and CLI wrapping paths v4.6.57 same vulnerable helper and CLI wrapping paths v4.6.58 same vulnerable helper and dynamic PoV succeeds

Impact

If a PraisonAI user starts a local or internal legacy SSE MCP server with registered tools, an attacker who gets that user to visit a malicious website can use DNS rebinding to interact with the SSE server through the browser. The attacker can discover exposed tools and invoke them as the local user.

Impact depends on the configured tools. In realistic PraisonAI MCP deployments, registered tools may access local files, repositories, issue trackers, cloud APIs, internal services, or other automation targets. This can lead to confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact for the resources reachable by the exposed tools.

The PoV is local-only and harmless. It exposes one marker tool that writes a canary string to a temporary directory.

Root cause

Current ToolsMCPServer.run_sse() constructs a Starlette app directly:

sse_path = "/sse" messages_path = "/messages/" sse_transport = SseServerTransport(messages_path) async def handle_sse(request: Request): async with sse_transport.connect_sse( request.scope, request.receive, request._send ) as (read_stream, write_stream): await mcp._mcp_server.run( read_stream, write_stream, mcp._mcp_server.create_initialization_options() ) app = Starlette( debug=self._debug, routes=[ Route(sse_path, endpoint=handle_sse), Mount(messages_path, app=sse_transport.handle_post_message), ] ) uvicorn.run(app, host=host, port=port)

There is no middleware or route-level check for:

  • Origin
  • Host
  • Authorization
  • API key
  • allowed origins / allowed hosts

The configured CLI wrapper exposes this path:

from praisonaiagents.mcp import MCP, ToolsMCPServer cmd_string = " ".join(cmd) mcp = MCP(cmd_string, timeout=60, env=server.env or {}) tools = mcp.get_tools() mcp_server = ToolsMCPServer(name=name, tools=tools) mcp_server.run_sse(host=host, port=port)

By contrast, the current Streamable HTTP transport validates Origin and returns HTTP 403 for an invalid origin:

origin = request.headers.get("Origin") if not self._validate_origin(origin): return JSONResponse(..., status_code=403)

Local-only PoV

Run from the harness checkout:

uv run --with mcp --with starlette --with uvicorn --with httpx --with anyio \ python submission-bundle/praisonai-prai-cand-015-mcp-sse-host-origin-bypass/poc/pov_prai_cand_015_sse_mcp_host_origin_bypass.py \ --repo-src artifacts/repos/praisonai-v4.6.58/src

Observed current-head result:

{ "candidate": "PRAI-CAND-015", "http_stream_control": { "attacker_origin": "http://attacker.example.test", "rejects_attacker_origin": true, "status_code": 403, "transport": "current_http_stream" }, "source_checks": { "has_auth_check": false, "has_host_check": false, "has_origin_check": false, "has_sse_transport": true, "route_count": 2 }, "sse_probe": { "attacker_headers": { "Host": "attacker.example.test:62380", "Origin": "http://attacker.example.test:62380" }, "bind_host": "127.0.0.1", "marker_value": "executed-from-attacker-origin", "marker_written": true, "server_started": true, "tool_call_content": [ "recorded:executed-from-attacker-origin" ], "tool_call_error": false, "tool_names": [ "record_marker" ], "vulnerable": true }, "vulnerable": true }

The PoV:

  1. imports the current ToolsMCPServer;
  2. registers one marker tool;
  3. monkey-patches uvicorn.run only to capture the exact Starlette app created by run_sse();
  4. starts that app on 127.0.0.1;
  5. connects to /sse with attacker-controlled Host and Origin;
  6. lists tools and calls the marker tool;
  7. runs a control against PraisonAI's current Streamable HTTP transport and confirms the same attacker Origin is rejected with HTTP 403.

Why this is not intended behavior

This is not only a trust-model disagreement.

PraisonAI's MCP documentation describes Streamable HTTP, WebSocket, and legacy SSE as supported MCP transport mechanisms. The same documentation says the MCP module's security properties include origin validation, authentication headers, and secure session IDs. The transport guide also has a dedicated security section for origin validation as DNS rebinding prevention and authentication.

The official MCP specification warns that HTTP transports need origin validation to prevent DNS rebinding, should bind locally for local servers, and should implement authentication. It also says that without those protections, remote websites can interact with local MCP servers.

The upstream MCP Python SDK advisory GHSA-9h52-p55h-vw2f / CVE-2025-66416 classifies unauthenticated localhost HTTP/SSE MCP servers without DNS rebinding protection as a High severity issue because malicious websites can invoke tools or access resources exposed by the local MCP server. That advisory also says custom low-level SseServerTransport configurations should explicitly configure transport security settings when running unauthenticated localhost servers.

PraisonAI's current Streamable HTTP implementation already enforces an Origin guard and rejects the exact attacker Origin used in the PoV. The issue is that the legacy SSE sibling path lacks the same boundary.

Suggested severity

Suggested severity: High.

Rationale:

  • AV: the attack uses browser-origin HTTP requests to a local/internal service.
  • AC: practical exploitation requires DNS rebinding or equivalent browser origin setup.
  • PR: no PraisonAI credentials are required by the SSE server.
  • UR: the user must visit an attacker-controlled page.
  • S: the vulnerable transport exposes tools that operate on resources outside the HTTP transport itself.
  • C/I/A: exposed tools may read, mutate, or disrupt local/internal resources depending on the configured MCP server.

Suggested fix

Bring legacy SSE server security in line with the current Streamable HTTP transport, or disable the legacy SSE server path.

Recommended changes:

  1. Add explicit allowed-origin and allowed-host validation to both /sse and /messages/.
  2. Reject invalid Origin with HTTP 403 before opening the SSE stream or accepting POST messages.
  3. Validate Host for local and internal deployments to mitigate DNS rebinding even when browsers omit or vary Origin.
  4. Require authentication for all non-stdio MCP HTTP transports, including SSE.
  5. Add --api-key, --allowed-origins, and --allowed-hosts options to praisonai mcp run and praisonai serve mcp when --transport sse is used.
  6. Where the installed MCP SDK supports it, configure the SDK transport-security settings for low-level SseServerTransport usage instead of mounting it without Host/Origin protection.
  7. Consider deprecating or disabling --transport sse server mode in favor of the current Streamable HTTP implementation.
  8. Add regression tests proving that attacker Host and Origin values are rejected on both /sse and /messages/, and that current Streamable HTTP and legacy SSE enforce the same boundary.

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: High
  • Score: 8.3
  • AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

CWEs:

Software From Fixed in
Python icon praisonaiagents 0.6.0 1.6.59
Python icon praisonai 3.10.0 4.6.59

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.