CVE-2026-82417 — @types / qs
Uncaught ExceptionSummary
qs.stringify throws a TypeError when it serializes an object whose own constructor property has a truthy, non-callable isBuffer member. utils.isBuffer duck-types buffers by calling obj.constructor.isBuffer(obj) after checking only that the property is truthy, so a value such as { constructor: { isBuffer: "x" } } makes the call throw TypeError: obj.constructor.isBuffer is not a function.
Details
lib/stringify.js:127 calls utils.isBuffer on every non-primitive value it serializes. utils.isBuffer (lib/utils.js:332) reads obj.constructor.isBuffer and invokes it without verifying that it is a function. constructor and isBuffer are ordinary property names, so any object carrying them as own properties reaches the unchecked call.
Such an object can be built from untrusted input. qs.parse("x[constructor][isBuffer]=y", { plainObjects: true }) or { allowPrototypes: true } keeps the constructor key as an own property (the default parse options drop it), and JSON.parse("{\"a\":{\"constructor\":{\"isBuffer\":\"x\"}}}") produces the same shape with no qs option involved. Express 4 with its default query parser setting and body-parser with extended: true both call qs.parse with allowPrototypes: true, so on those stacks req.query and req.body can carry the shape directly.
PoC
var qs = require("qs");
qs.stringify(qs.parse("x[constructor][isBuffer]=y", { plainObjects: true }));
qs.stringify(JSON.parse("{\"a\":{\"constructor\":{\"isBuffer\":\"x\"}}}"));
// TypeError: obj.constructor.isBuffer is not a function
// at Object.isBuffer (lib/utils.js:332:78)
// at stringify (lib/stringify.js:127:45)
Fix
lib/utils.js, applied in e83d321 on main and released as v6.16.0:
- return !!(obj.constructor && obj.constructor.isBuffer && obj.constructor.isBuffer(obj));
+ return !!(obj.constructor && typeof obj.constructor.isBuffer === "function" && obj.constructor.isBuffer(obj));
Real Buffer, safer-buffer, and browserify buffer polyfill instances serialize exactly as before; only the throw is removed.
Affected versions
>=2.2.5 <6.16.0, fixed in v6.16.0.
The unguarded duck-type was introduced in 3768a75 and first shipped in v2.2.5 (September 2014). v2.2.4 and earlier used Buffer.isBuffer and are not affected. Every release from v2.2.5 through v6.15.3 contains the unguarded call.
Impact
An unauthenticated request can make any code path that re-serializes attacker-influenced data with qs.stringify (for example, rebuilding a query string from req.query for a redirect or an upstream request, or serializing a parsed JSON body) throw synchronously. In a typical Node.js HTTP framework the throw is caught by the framework error boundary and the affected request returns a 500; the process survives and other requests are unaffected. Where the call runs outside an error boundary, such as an async Express 4 handler (where the throw becomes an unhandled promise rejection) or a background job, the process exits, so the impact in that case depends on the application error handling rather than on qs.
| Software | Affected versions |
|---|---|
@types / qs
|
>= 2.2.5, < 6.16.0 |
Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity
SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.
- No setup fees
- 5-min deployment
- Cancel anytime
Frequently Asked Questions
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.