Vulnerability Database

383,211

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2026-89460

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

s390/cpum_cf: Handle CPU hotplug via prepare/dead callbacks

The command 'perf stat -e cycles -- <command>' crashes the kernel when CPUs are hotplug added during that run.

Root cause is the allocation of struct cpu_cf_events at first event initialization. The allocation is dynamic and the first event that has task context creates such a structure for each online CPU. This is not sufficient. CPUs may be offline during event creation and can be set online during the perf run time. For example commands

echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online

perf stat -e cycles -i -- stress-ng -t10s --matrix X

sleep 1

echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online

create an event for CPUs 0,2-X. Since the events are created with task-context, the scheduler will eventually schedule the program on CPU1. This CPU has not created and initialized any per CPU event infrastructure as that CPU was not online at the time of the perf invocation. Thus when the scheduler runs stress-ng on CPU1, the function cpumf_pmu_add() refers to a NULL pointer:

struct cpu_cf_events *cpuhw = this_cpu_cfhw();

This function call is invoked after the task stress-ng has been made runnable on CPU1. And this_cpu_cfhw() returns NULL.

The result is a panic: Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference in virtual kernel address space Failing address: 0000000000000000 TEID: 0000000000000483 .... Krnl PSW : 0404d00180000000 000003ef8291fd0c (cpumf_pmu_add+0x3c/0x80) .... Call Trace: [<000003ef8291fd0c>] cpumf_pmu_add+0x3c/0x80 [<000003ef82bb5e3e>] event_sched_in+0xae/0x190 [<000003ef82bb60d6>] merge_sched_in+0x1b6/0x390 [<000003ef82bb65b8>] visit_groups_merge.constprop.0.isra.0+0x308/0x5b0 [<000003ef82bb689a>] pmu_groups_sched_in+0x3a/0x50 [<000003ef82bb6a30>] ctx_sched_in+0x180/0x260 [<000003ef82bb780c>] perf_event_context_sched_in+0x11c/0x2d0 [<000003ef82bb79ee>] __perf_event_task_sched_in+0x2e/0xc0 [<000003ef82994834>] finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x1a4/0x250 .... Last Breaking-Event-Address: [<000003ef8291f1d8>] this_cpu_cfhw+0x38/0x40

The issue arises only in per-task context when the CPUMF facility is used and the scheduler picks a random CPU for such a process to run on. The scheduler enables the CPUMF infrastructure via PMU callback functions pmu::add() and pmu::del().

Introduce a CPU hotplug prepare/dead callback pair which creates and removes the per CPU counter data while the CPU is offline. Count the users which track every CPU (cpu == -1), that is perf_event_open() events with task context and /dev/hwctr device sessions, in the new counter cpu_cf_root::tskcnt, protected by pmc_reserve_mutex. This ensures the infrastructure is available when new CPU is selected to run the per-task context process.

In cpum_cf_free_root() and cpum_cf_free_cpu() ensure the reference pointer to data structures is set to NULL before the data is freed to prevent interrupt handlers to access stale data.

[[email protected]: change commit message]

  • Published: Sep 11, 2026
  • Updated: Sep 12, 2026
  • CVE: CVE-2026-89460
  • Exploit:
  • CISA KEV:

No technical information available.

No CWE or OWASP classifications available.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.