Vulnerability Database

413,619

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Echo: BodyDump can discard BodyLimit overflow errors for unknown-length requests — github.com/labstack/echo/v5

Unchecked Return Value

Impact

Echo v5's BodyDump middleware captured a bounded prefix, drained the remaining request body while ignoring read errors, and then replaced the body with the captured prefix. With an outer BodyLimit, an unknown-length request such as an HTTP/1.1 chunked request, and a BodyDump capture limit below the BodyLimit threshold, an overflow detected during that drain could be discarded.

The handler could consequently process a truncated request and return success even though the original body exceeded the configured limit. This is a conditional size-policy bypass; no general authentication bypass, production data modification or denial of service is claimed. Known-length requests rejected before BodyDump runs are unaffected by this path.

Affected versions and patch

All v5 releases from v5.0.0 through v5.4.0 contain the affected drain-and-replace logic. Runtime reproduction confirmed v5.4.0; source comparison confirms the same request handling in v5.0.0.

Upgrade to v5.4.1. BodyDump now captures only the configured prefix for logging and reconstructs the handler's reader from that prefix plus the unread original stream. It preserves the original closer and read errors instead of silently draining the rest. Fix commit.

Streaming BodyLimit enforcement still requires the application to consume the request body and handle read errors. The BodyDump capture cap is a logging cap, not an application body limit.

Workarounds

Disable BodyDump on affected routes, or ensure the BodyLimit overflow is detected during the initial capture by setting the capture limit above the enforced body limit. Upgrading is recommended because it also preserves the complete body for handlers.

Credits

Reported by @Duodum. The fix incorporates @jakezwang's request-body preservation work in #3105.

  • Published: Oct 23, 2026
  • Updated: Oct 29, 2026
  • GHSA: GHSA-x9ff-22gv-65f4
  • Severity: Medium
  • Exploit:
  • CISA KEV:

No technical information available.

CWEs:

Is v5 exposed on your perimeter?

A vulnerability database tells you what is broken. Attack surface management tells you where it is running: it discovers your internet-facing assets and flags the ones affected by issues like this one.

What is attack surface management? →

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.