flask_security.utils.validate_redirect_url() can allow an attacker-controlled redirect URL when subdomain redirects are enabled.
The bypass uses a backslash inside the URL authority/host:
http://evil.com\.whitelist.com
http://evil.com%5C.whitelist.com
Python's urlsplit() parses the full authority as evil.com\.whitelist.com or evil.com%5C.whitelist.com. Because the value ends with .whitelist.com, validate_redirect_url() accepts it as an allowed subdomain of whitelist.com.
This is similar in class to the previous Flask-Security-Too open redirect advisory CVE-2023-49438 / GHSA-672h-6x89-76m5, where crafted redirect URLs bypassed validation through browser URL normalization behavior.
The issue requires subdomain redirects to be enabled:
SERVER_NAME = "whitelist.com"
SECURITY_REDIRECT_ALLOW_SUBDOMAINS = True
Tested environment:
Flask-Security: 5.8.0
Flask: 3.1.3
Werkzeug: 3.1.8
An attacker can craft a URL that passes Flask-Security's redirect validation and produces a 302 response to an attacker-controlled URL-like authority.
This can be used for phishing or other attacks that rely on a trusted application redirecting users to an attacker-controlled destination.
from __future__ import annotations
from importlib.metadata import version
from urllib.parse import urlsplit
from flask import Flask, jsonify, redirect, request
from flask_security.utils import validate_redirect_url
app = Flask(__name__)
app.config.update(
SECRET_KEY="poc-only",
SERVER_NAME="whitelist.com",
SECURITY_REDIRECT_ALLOW_SUBDOMAINS=True,
SECURITY_REDIRECT_BASE_DOMAIN=None,
SECURITY_REDIRECT_ALLOWED_SUBDOMAINS=[],
)
@app.get("/")
def index():
return jsonify(
flask_version=version("Flask"),
configured_server_name=app.config["SERVER_NAME"],
examples=[
r"http://evil.com\.whitelist.com",
"http://evil.com%5C.whitelist.com",
"http://sub.whitelist.com",
"http://sub.not-whitelist.com",
],
)
@app.get("/check")
def check():
next_url = request.args.get("next", "")
parsed = urlsplit(next_url)
return jsonify(
next=next_url,
valid=validate_redirect_url(next_url),
parsed={
"scheme": parsed.scheme,
"netloc": parsed.netloc,
"hostname": parsed.hostname,
"path": parsed.path,
},
)
@app.get("/redir")
def redir():
next_url = request.args.get("next", "")
if not validate_redirect_url(next_url):
return jsonify(error="blocked", next=next_url), 400
return redirect(next_url)
if __name__ == "__main__":
app.run(host="127.0.0.1", port=5000, debug=False)
Run the PoC with the target project's Flask version:
.venv/bin/python poc_redirect_app.py
The invalid comparison case is correctly blocked:
http://127.0.0.1:5000/redir?next=http://evil.com
Observed result:
<img width="1019" height="294" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/de25ac4d-b37f-4369-928e-f44dfd5b7557" />
Check the validation result:
http://127.0.0.1:5000/check?next=http://evil.com%5C.whitelist.com
Observed result:
<img width="1029" height="634" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8e5ec8a6-42a4-438a-8d12-a27724519091" />
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.