How should we interpret CVSS severity scores?

CVSS estimates technical severity, but it does not automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, asset criticality, known exploitation, and whether compensating controls exist. A Medium CVSS on an exposed production system can be more urgent than a Critical on an isolated non-production host.

Vulnerability Database

Q: What is a Vulnerability (CVE) and why does it matter?

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

Q: What's the difference between a vulnerability, an exploit, and a zero-day?

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. Risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Q: Why do vulnerabilities keep reappearing in our environment?

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete asset discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host.

Q: How do we prioritize remediation without burning out the team?

Use a repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress so remediation is steady, not reactive.

Q: How can SynScan help reduce vulnerability risk over time?

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.

361,925

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Grav has multiple RCE vectors: unsafe unserialize (x3), command injection in git clone, SSTI blocklist bypass — getgrav / grav

Deserialization of Untrusted Data

Multiple RCE vectors were found in Grav CMS. Three are critical, two are high.

1. Unsafe unserialize() in JobQueue — direct RCE gadget (Critical)

system/src/Grav/Common/Scheduler/JobQueue.php:465 calls unserialize(base64_decode(...)) without restricting allowed_classes. The Job class has call_user_func_array($this->command, $this->args) in its execution path, which is a direct gadget chain — inject a serialized Job with command = 'system' and args = ['whoami'].

The same codebase actually has a Serializable trait that correctly restricts classes, so this inconsistency stands out.

2. Unsafe unserialize() in FileCache — arbitrary class instantiation (Critical)

system/src/Grav/Framework/Cache/Adapter/FileCache.php:75 does unserialize($value, ['allowed_classes' => true]). That true allows instantiation of any class. If an attacker can write to the cache directory (via any file write primitive), they get object injection → RCE.

3. Unsafe unserialize() in Session (High)

system/src/Grav/Common/Session.php:116 — same allowed_classes => true pattern on session data. Lower severity since session storage is typically more restricted.

4. Command injection in git clone (Critical)

system/src/Grav/Console/Cli/InstallCommand.php:150 — only $this->destination uses escapeshellarg(). The $data['branch'], $data['url'], and $data['path'] variables go directly into the shell command without escaping. Admin-accessible via plugin/theme installation.

5. SSTI blocklist bypass (High)

system/src/Grav/Common/Security.php:267-286 — cleanDangerousTwig() blocks twig_array_map and twig_array_filter but not twig_array_reduce. Also missing file_get_contents and fwrite from the dangerous function blocklist. An attacker who can inject Twig templates can bypass the security filter.

All five are independently exploitable. The unserialize issues are the most concerning since they don't require admin access if there's any file write primitive.

— ProScan AppSec | proscan.one

Maintainer note — fix applied (2026-04-24)

Fixed in Grav core on the 2.0 branch: commit c66dfeb5f (items #1, #2, #3, #4) and commit 38685ac25 + c66dfeb5f (item #5) — ships in 2.0.0-beta.2.

All five vectors addressed:

Scheduler\JobQueue unsafe unserialize — serialized_job now carries a sibling serialized_job_hmac signed with Security::getNonceKey(). reconstructJob refuses to unserialize an item whose HMAC is missing/mismatched and falls through to the safe structured-fields rebuild. A tampered queue file can no longer smuggle a forged Job for direct RCE via Job::exec → call_user_func_array.
→ system/src/Grav/Common/Scheduler/JobQueue.php
FileCache unsafe unserialize — same HMAC-integrity approach; see separate GHSA-gwfr-jfjf-92vv.
→ system/src/Grav/Framework/Cache/Adapter/FileCache.php
Session::getFlashObject unsafe unserialize — payload now wrapped in a v2|<hmac>|<serialized> envelope; legacy/forged envelopes return null instead of triggering unserialize.
→ system/src/Grav/Common/Session.php
InstallCommand git clone shell injection — branch, url, and path values read from user/.dependencies are now passed through escapeshellarg, with a -- separator before url/path to block option-injection (e.g. --upload-pack=evil).
→ system/src/Grav/Console/Cli/InstallCommand.php
SSTI blocklist bypass — twig_array_reduce (the specific name called out) plus twig_array_some and twig_array_every added to cleanDangerousTwig's CALLABLE_DANGEROUS_NAMES alongside the existing twig_array_map/filter. More importantly, the new Twig content sandbox in 2.0.0-beta.2 blocks this class of attack at a different layer — see the sandbox work in 38685ac25.
→ system/src/Grav/Common/Security.php

Tests:

tests/unit/Grav/Common/Security/UnserializeIntegritySecurityTest.php — 8 cases covering JobQueue + Session HMAC integrity.
tests/unit/Grav/Common/Security/FileCacheSecurityTest.php.
tests/unit/Grav/Common/Security/CleanDangerousTwigTest.php — new twig_array_* entries in providerCallbackFunctions.

Published: May 5, 2026
Updated: May 6, 2026
GHSA: GHSA-vj3m-2g9h-vm4p
Severity: Critical
Exploit:
CISA KEV:

No technical information available.

CWEs:

OWASP TOP 10:

Affected Software
References

Software	From	Fixed in
getgrav / grav	-	2.0.0-beta.2

Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity

SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.

No setup fees
5-min deployment
Cancel anytime

Book a Demo

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Vulnerability (CVE) and why does it matter?

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.