Vulnerability Database

383,371

Total vulnerabilities in the database

humanfs: Recursive copy follows symlinked files and copies data from outside the source tree — @humanfs / node

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

Summary

@humanfs/node does not treat symlinks as a separate case during copy operations. A symlink placed inside an attacker-controlled source tree can make copyAll() read and copy the contents of any file readable by the process, even when that file is outside the directory being copied.

Details

The Node implementation exposes symlink state through list(), but copyAll() ignores it. During recursive copies, every non-directory entry is passed to copy(), which delegates to fs.promises.copyFile().

On Node, copyFile() dereferences symlinks. As a result, a symlink inside the copied tree is handled as if it were an ordinary file, and the destination receives the contents of the symlink target rather than a copy of the link itself.

That breaks the expected boundary of a directory copy. A caller can point copyAll() at a seemingly self-contained directory and still end up copying data from elsewhere on the host filesystem if the source tree contains attacker-supplied symlinks.

The same dereference behavior also affects copy() when the source path itself is a symlink.

PoC

import { NodeHfs } from "@humanfs/node"; import fs from "node:fs/promises"; import path from "node:path"; import os from "node:os"; const root = await fs.mkdtemp(path.join(os.tmpdir(), "humanfs-")); const src = path.join(root, "src"); const dst = path.join(root, "dst"); const secret = path.join(root, "secret.txt"); await fs.mkdir(src); await fs.writeFile(secret, "TOPSECRET"); await fs.symlink(secret, path.join(src, "link.txt")); const hfs = new NodeHfs(); await hfs.copyAll(src, dst); console.log(await fs.readFile(path.join(dst, "link.txt"), "utf8")); // TOPSECRET

Impact

If an application uses copyAll() or copy() on attacker-controlled paths, a symlink can be used to pull arbitrary readable host files into the copied output. In practice, that can turn a normal workspace copy, export, or packaging step into a file disclosure primitive.

  • Published: Sep 2, 2026
  • Updated: Sep 4, 2026
  • GHSA: GHSA-p498-v437-472g
  • Severity: Medium
  • Exploit:
  • CISA KEV:

No technical information available.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.