JupyterLab: Cross-site scripting (XSS) via crafted settings file (`overrides.json`) — jupyterlab
Improper Encoding or Escaping of OutputJupyterLab 4.5+ allows notebook settings to be shared and applied through an overrides.json file using the Import button in the Settings Editor.
Certain notebook display settings were not properly validated before being applied. As a result, a crafted settings file could contain hidden instructions that run as code inside JupyterLab when imported, instead of only changing a display preference.
Because importing a settings file appears harmless, a user could import a file shared by another party without realizing it could do more. On multi-tenant file systems without proper permission control, another user could plant a malicious overrides.json.
> CVE assignment pending, GitHub CNA is experiencing severe backlog
Impact
When a malicious settings file is applied, the embedded code runs with the same access as the affected user. This could allow an attacker to read or modify that user's notebooks and files, and to run code on the user's behalf through the notebook server, including on any connected kernel.
User Interaction vs Privileges Required
Write access to a loaded settings location
If an attacker can write to a directory JupyterLab loads settings from (e.g. on shared or multi-tenant file system), they could place a crafted overrides.json that is applied to another user automatically at startup. This requires high privilages but no action by the victim.
User-imported settings file
A user can import a crafted overrides.json through the Import button in the Settings Editor, having received it from another party. This requires no privileges but a deliberate action by the victim, who reasonably expects a settings file to change preferences rather than run code.
Patches
JupyterLab 4.6.2 and 4.5.10 were patched.
Workarounds
None
Hardening
- Treat a settings file as something that can affect how JupyterLab behaves, not only how it appears. Administrators are encouraged to establish a trusted process for distributing configuration rather than relying on ad-hoc importing of shared files.
- On multi-tenant or shared file systems, restrict write permissions on the application settings directory and other Jupyter configuration paths so that one user cannot place an
overrides.json(or other configuration) readable by another user. A settings file in these locations is applied automatically, without an import step, so directory permissions are the primary control against cross-user tampering.
| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
jupyterlab
|
4.6.0 | 4.6.2 |
|
jupyterlab
|
3.3.0 | 4.5.10 |
- https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab/commit/be9303f5bcd5308eaeae953c5a3c903046682c2c
- https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab/commit/f1beab4a2027af4719d6edc07d52d6cf5a39a432
- https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab/pull/19184
- https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab/pull/19185
- https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab/pull/19186
- https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab/releases/tag/v4.5.10
- https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab/releases/tag/v4.6.2
- https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab/security/advisories/GHSA-pppj-hq3g-57pj
Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity
SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.
- No setup fees
- 5-min deployment
- Cancel anytime
Frequently Asked Questions
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.