Vulnerability Database

363,159

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Kite Kubernetes proxy path traversal allows authenticated users to bypass RBAC and read cluster-wide resources — github.com/zxh326/kite

Use of Non-Canonical URL Paths for Authorization Decisions

Summary

Kite versions 0.6.9 through 0.14.0 authorize Kubernetes proxy requests against the pod or service identified by the original route parameters. Encoded path traversal segments can cause the upstream URL to resolve to a different Kubernetes API endpoint after authorization.

Impact

An authenticated user with get permission on pods or services in one namespace can cause Kite to issue GET requests to Kubernetes API endpoints outside that namespace using Kite's service account.

With Kite's default Helm RBAC configuration, this allows cluster-wide resource disclosure, including Secrets. The validated impact is confidentiality only; resource modification and denial of service were not demonstrated.

Deployments using a restricted Kite service account are affected only up to the permissions granted to that service account.

Technical details

The authorization check is performed against the original namespace and kind route parameters. The proxy path is subsequently decoded and passed to url.JoinPath, which resolves .. segments and can produce an upstream URL outside the authorized pod or service proxy prefix.

Two input locations were affected:

  1. Encoded traversal segments in the proxy catch-all path.
  2. Encoded traversal and slash characters in the resource name.

Reproduction

  1. Create a user with a role granting only pods:get in namespace default.
  2. Create any pod in default (e.g. nginx).
  3. Send the following request (auth cookie required):
curl --path-as-is --cookie "auth_token=<JWT>" \ 'http://<kite-host>/api/v1/_clusters/<cluster>/namespaces/default/pods/nginx/proxy/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/kube-system/secrets'

Patches

Fixed in Kite 0.14.1.

  • https://github.com/kite-org/kite/releases/tag/v0.14.1

Workarounds

Upgrade to 0.14.1 or later.

If upgrading is temporarily impossible, reject encoded dot segments and encoded slashes at the reverse proxy and restrict Kite's Kubernetes service account permissions. Reverse-proxy normalization should not be treated as a permanent fix.

  • Published: Jul 24, 2026
  • Updated: Jul 25, 2026
  • GHSA: GHSA-c534-2w9c-x7fm
  • Severity: Medium
  • Exploit:
  • CISA KEV:

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: Medium
  • Score: 6.5
  • AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

CWEs:

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.